In this comparison, Nissan ARIYA leads on city driving, while the Toyota bZ4X leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs.
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
Choose the Toyota bZ4X if...
Our take
The Toyota bZ4X leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £37,000 (better) | £39,995 |
| Official range | 250 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 466 L (better) | 452 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,595 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,850 mm (better) | 1,860 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,172 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,660 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.5 m | 11.2 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 550 mm spare (better) | 540 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 466 L (better) | 452 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1350 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 750 kg |
| Specification | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4X Icon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.69m+95mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.86m+10mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.17m | Not available |
| Height | 1.66m | 1.65m-10mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.85m+75mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 177mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 466L (better) | 452L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1350L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.5m | 11.2m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,917kg | 1,870kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 57.7kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 250 mi | 276 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 130kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £37,000 (better) | £39,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £35,500 (-£1,500) | £39,995 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 250 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 209 miles | 230 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 130 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 63 kWh (better) | 54 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| Torque | 300 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Get a quote
Nissan ARIYA
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X costs £2,995 more than the Nissan ARIYA. For that premium it adds 25 miles more WLTP range. The Nissan ARIYA is not just cheaper - it also offers 35 kW more power and a 1.1s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota bZ4X comes out ahead overall.
The Nissan ARIYA is £2,995 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Nissan ARIYA comes out roughly £2,875 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA and 230 miles for the Toyota bZ4X - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota bZ4X goes roughly 21 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-30 minutes.
The two are within 10 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 540 mm of total clearance for the Toyota bZ4X. The Toyota bZ4X also turns in a 0.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Nissan ARIYA and 84% for the Toyota bZ4X. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
More Toyota bZ4X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Toyota bZ4X buyer’s guide: the 2022-2025 car vs the 2026 update, FWD vs AWD, 6.6 or 11 kW charging, recalls, Toyota’s service-activated warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .