In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz GLC leads on motorway range and charging speed, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, running costs and city driving.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz GLC if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
400 4MATIC
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £61,100 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 405 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 22 min (better) | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 6.9 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,845 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,913 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,089 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,644 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.1 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 487 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 2,400 kg (better) | 1,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz GLC 400 4MATIC | Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.84m | 4.65m-196mm |
| Width | 1.91m | 1.88m-34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.09m | 2.15m+59mm |
| Height | 1.64m | 1.62m-24mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.97m | 2.77m-207mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.1m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,581kg | 1,924kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 2,400kg (better) | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 94kWh (better) | 62kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 405 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 330kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £61,100 | £33,450 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 405 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 297 miles (better) | 208 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 22 min (better) | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 330 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 94 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 800V (better) | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.9 sec (better) | 8.7 sec |
| Power | 360 kW (better) | 132 kW |
| Torque | 800 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Mercedes-Benz GLC
400 4MATIC

Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz GLC400 4MATIC | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz GLC
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz GLC
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
The Mercedes-Benz GLC costs £27,650 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 155 miles more WLTP range, 210 kW faster peak rapid charging and 228 kW more power. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 65 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £27,650 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £27,690 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 297 miles for the Mercedes-Benz GLC and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz GLC goes roughly 89 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 22-24 minutes.
The Skoda Enyaq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Mercedes-Benz GLC. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 487 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz GLC. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.8 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz GLC comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .