In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA leads on city driving, while the Toyota bZ4X leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if...
Choose the Toyota bZ4X if...
Our take
The Toyota bZ4X wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 | £39,995 (better) |
| Official range | 263 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 340 L | 452 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm (better) | 1,860 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 11.2 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare (better) | 540 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 452 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 750 kg |
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Toyota bZ4X Icon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.69m+227mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.86m+26mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.65m+30mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.85m+121mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 177mm+9mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 452L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 11.2m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | 1,870kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh (better) | 57.7kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi | 276 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 | £39,995 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles | 230 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 54 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 140 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range, seat comfort & space. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Toyota bZ4X
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Toyota bZ4X
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA costs £3,500 more than the Toyota bZ4X. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Toyota bZ4X is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 112 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota bZ4X comes out ahead overall.
The Toyota bZ4X is £3,500 cheaper to buy. The Toyota bZ4X is cheaper to charge, roughly £144 a year versus £176 for the Mercedes-Benz EQA, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Toyota bZ4X comes out roughly £3,660 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 230 miles for the Toyota bZ4X - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-30 minutes.
The two are within 26 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and about 540 mm of total clearance for the Toyota bZ4X.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 84% for the Toyota bZ4X. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Toyota bZ4X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a used Mercedes-Benz EQA: the 250, 250+ and 4MATIC versions, realistic range, the software recalls, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
GuideA used Toyota bZ4X buyer’s guide: the 2022-2025 car vs the 2026 update, FWD vs AWD, 6.6 or 11 kW charging, recalls, Toyota’s service-activated warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .