In this comparison, Mazda 6e leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality, while the Volvo ES90 leads on charging speed.
Choose the Mazda 6e if...
Choose the Volvo ES90 if...
Our take
The Mazda 6e wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Single Motor Extended Range
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £38,995 (better) | £67,560 |
| Official range | 348 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 336 L | 424 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec | 6.6 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,921 mm | 5,000 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,890 mm (better) | 1,942 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,120 mm |
| Height | 1,491 mm | 1,549 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 12 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 510 mm spare (better) | 458 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 899 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 336 L | 424 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1427 L |
| Frunk | 72 L (better) | 27 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,600 kg |
| Specification | Mazda 6e Takumi | Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.92m | 5.00m+79mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.94m+52mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.12m |
| Height | 1.49m | 1.55m+58mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 3.10m+207mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 336L | 424L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1427L |
| Frunk | 72L (better) | 27L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 899mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 12m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,027kg (better) | 2,410kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,600kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 78kWh | 92kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 348 mi | 409 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 195kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,995 (better) | £67,560 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | Saloon |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
* Volvo ES90: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 348 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 290 miles (better) | 286 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 195 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 158 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 78 kWh | 92 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec | 6.6 sec (better) |
| Power | 190 kW | 245 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 480 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mazda 6e
Takumi

Volvo ES90
Single Motor Extended Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Get a quote
Mazda 6e
Volvo ES90
The Volvo ES90 costs £28,565 more than the Mazda 6e. For that premium it adds 61 miles more WLTP range, 155 kW faster peak rapid charging and 88 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mazda 6e comes out ahead overall.
The Mazda 6e is £28,565 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Mazda 6e comes out roughly £28,685 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 290 miles for the Mazda 6e and 286 miles for the Volvo ES90 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 22-24 minutes.
The Mazda 6e is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 52 mm narrower than the Volvo ES90. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 510 mm of total clearance for the Mazda 6e and about 458 mm of total clearance for the Volvo ES90. The Mazda 6e also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Mazda 6e and 84% for the Volvo ES90. That gives the Mazda 6e a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Mazda 6e's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Volvo ES90's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mazda 6e comparisons
More Volvo ES90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .