In this comparison, BMW i5 leads on family practicality and running costs, while the Volvo ES90 leads on charging speed.
Choose the BMW i5 if...
Choose the Volvo ES90 if...
Our take
The BMW i5 edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Single Motor Extended Range
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £67,795 | £67,560 (better) |
| Official range | 357 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 490 L (better) | 424 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6 sec (better) | 6.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,060 mm | 5,000 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,900 mm (better) | 1,942 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,120 mm |
| Height | 1,515 mm | 1,549 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.3 m | 12 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 500 mm spare (better) | 458 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 899 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 490 L (better) | 424 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1427 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 27 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,600 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BMW i5
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Volvo ES90
| Specification | BMW i5 eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.06m | 5.00m-60mm |
| Width | 1.90m | 1.94m+42mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.12m |
| Height | 1.51m | 1.55m+34mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.00m | 3.10m+107mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 490L (better) | 424L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1427L |
| Frunk | Not available | 27L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 899mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.3m | 12m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,195kg (better) | 2,410kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,600kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 83.9kWh | 92kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 357 mi | 409 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 205kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £67,795 | £67,560 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | Saloon |
| Available | 2023+ | 2026+ |
* Volvo ES90: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 357 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 297 miles (better) | 286 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 205 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 22 kW (better) | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 158 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 81.2 kWh | 92 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6 sec (better) | 6.6 sec |
| Power | 250 kW (better) | 245 kW |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 480 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

BMW i5
eDrive40 M Sport

Volvo ES90
Single Motor Extended Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2023
Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
BMW i5
Volvo ES90
The Volvo ES90 is £235 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the two land within £155 of each other - effectively the same to own. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 297 miles for the BMW i5 and 286 miles for the Volvo ES90 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 30 minutes in the BMW i5 and 22 in the Volvo ES90, so the Volvo ES90 loses less time at each stop.
The BMW i5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 42 mm narrower than the Volvo ES90. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 500 mm of total clearance for the BMW i5 and about 458 mm of total clearance for the Volvo ES90. The Volvo ES90 also turns in a 0.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the BMW i5 and 84% for the Volvo ES90. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BMW i5 comparisons
More Volvo ES90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .