Loading comparison
Ford Mustang Mach-E (2021-2024) vs Toyota C-HR+
Selected trimStandard RangeChange trim283 mi · 58 kWh · £34,495
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E stays competitive across the board, while the Toyota C-HR+ leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Toyota C-HR+ wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
ValueToyota
Ford
5.4
Toyota
6.3
Motorway RangeToyota
Ford
2.7
Toyota
5
Family
Ford
6.8
Toyota
6.6
Too close to call
ChargingToyota
Ford
3.1
Toyota
4.4
Cost Per MileToyota
Ford
2
Toyota
9.1
City DrivingToyota
Ford
2.9
Toyota
5.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,350 | £34,495 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 402 L | 416 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.4 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota C-HR+
Length
Ford Mustang Mach-E4,713mm
Toyota C-HR+4,520mm-193mm
Width
Ford Mustang Mach-E1,930mm
Toyota C-HR+1,870mm-60mm
Height
Ford Mustang Mach-E1,624mm
Toyota C-HR+1,595mm-29mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm | 1,870 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 11 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare | 530 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 416 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 100 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
- A 100 L frunk, one of 9 of 233 UK EVs in our catalogue with a front boot of 100 L or more.
- 2,984 mm wheelbase, longer than 85% of SUVs we track.
Toyota C-HR+
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2021-24) |  Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.52m-193mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.87m-60mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.59m-29mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.75m-234mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | 185mm+69mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 416L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | Not available |
| Frunk | 100L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 11m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg | 1,828kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 70kWh (better) | 58kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 283 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 115kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,350 | £34,495 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £40,350 (not eligible) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 203 miles | 235 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 115 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 70 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.4 sec |
| Power | 198 kW (better) | 123 kW |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Standard Range RWD (2021-24)
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2021-24)
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant92%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users69%
Safety Assist82%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant85%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users86%
Safety Assist79%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Toyota C-HR+
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford Mustang Mach-E worth the extra £5,855 over the Toyota C-HR+?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E costs £5,855 more than the Toyota C-HR+. For that premium it adds 75 kW more power and a 1.7s quicker 0-62mph time. The Toyota C-HR+ is not just cheaper - it also offers 35 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ is £5,855 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £192 for the Ford Mustang Mach-E, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Toyota C-HR+ comes out roughly £6,135 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 203 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 33 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-32 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 60 mm narrower than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+ and about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Toyota C-HR+ also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Toyota C-HR+?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Toyota C-HR+. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Toyota C-HR+'s NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best city EVsWhere the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Toyota C-HR+ rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .