In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Smart #1 leads on city driving.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the Smart #1 if...
Our take
The Ford Explorer leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Style 58kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £29,960 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 193 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 313 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,270 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,822 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | 2,025 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,636 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 578 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 313 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 976 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 15 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Explorer
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Smart #1
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Smart #1 Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.27m-198mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.82m-50mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.02m-38mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.64m+6mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.75m-17mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 313L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 976L |
| Frunk | Not available | 15L |
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg | Not available |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh (better) | 49kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 193 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £29,960 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £29,960 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2023+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 193 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles (better) | 133 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.4 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km (better) | 181 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh (better) | 49 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | Not available |
| Power | 140 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | Not available |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Smart #1
Pure
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 201,168 km (better) |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Smart #1
Pure
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Smart #1
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Explorer
No active listings.
Smart #1
The Ford Explorer costs £5,225 more than the Smart #1. For that premium it adds 80 miles more WLTP range, 157 litres more boot space and lower energy use, 164 versus 181 Wh/km. The Smart #1 is not just cheaper - it also offers 25 kW faster peak rapid charging and 60 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
The Smart #1 is £5,225 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Smart #1 comes out roughly £5,105 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 133 miles for the Smart #1 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Explorer goes roughly 50 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
The Smart #1 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 50 mm narrower than the Ford Explorer. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 578 mm of total clearance for the Smart #1 and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the Smart #1. That gives the Smart #1 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Smart #1's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Explorer's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Smart #1 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Smart #1 buyer’s guide: the 66 kWh Pro+, Premium and BRABUS and the later 49 kWh Pure and Pro, the seat belt recall, the short car warranty but 8-year battery cover, real-world range, what owners report and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .