In this comparison, Ford Explorer counters with the lowest price, while the Peugeot e-3008 leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Peugeot e-3008 if...
Our take
The Peugeot e-3008 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Allure
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £37,065 |
| Official range | 273 miles | 326 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L | 588 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,542 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,895 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,108 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,641 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.6 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 505 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L | 588 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L | 1663 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,250 kg (better) |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008 Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.54m+74mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.90m+23mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.11m+45mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.64m+11mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.74m-28mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L | 588L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L | 1663L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.6m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,108kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,250kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 73kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 326 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 160kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £37,065 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) (better) | £35,565 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 326 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 272 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 73 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.8 sec |
| Power | 140 kW | 157 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 343 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Peugeot e-3008
Allure
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Peugeot e-3008
Allure
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Peugeot e-3008
The Peugeot e-3008 costs £1,880 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 53 miles more WLTP range, 55 kW faster peak rapid charging and 118 litres more boot space. The Ford Explorer is not just cheaper - it also offers a 0.8s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Peugeot e-3008 comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Explorer is £1,880 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £1,760 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 272 miles for the Peugeot e-3008 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Peugeot e-3008 goes roughly 89 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
The two are within 23 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 505 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-3008. The Peugeot e-3008 also turns in a 0.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Peugeot e-3008. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Peugeot e-3008 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Peugeot E-3008 buyer’s guide: Allure and GT, the 73 kWh and Long Range 97 kWh versions, the suspension and door-handle recalls, warranty left, real-world range, the heat pump question, what to pay vs new with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .