In this comparison, Citroën ë-C4 X leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Nissan ARIYA stays competitive across the board.
Choose the Citroën ë-C4 X (2023-2024) if...
Our take
The Citroën ë-C4 X wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Engage+ 63kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,995 (better) | £37,000 |
| Official range | 222 miles | 250 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 510 L (better) | 466 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,600 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,800 mm (better) | 1,850 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,525 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 600 mm spare (better) | 550 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 510 L (better) | 466 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1350 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Citroën ë-C4 X
Nissan ARIYA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Citroën ë-C4 X 50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.60m | 4.59m-5mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.85m+50mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.17m |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.66m+135mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.67m | 2.77m+105mm |
| Ground Clearance | 156mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 510L (better) | 466L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1350L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.5m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,580kg (better) | 1,917kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 50kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 222 mi | 250 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,995 (better) | £37,000 |
| Price after EV grant | £31,995 (not eligible) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2024 | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 222 miles | 250 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 185 miles | 209 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 46 kWh | 63 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 10.8 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 300 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Citroën ë-C4 X50kWh 136 (2023-24) | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Citroën ë-C4 X
Nissan ARIYA
The Nissan ARIYA costs £5,005 more than the Citroën ë-C4 X. For that premium it adds 29 miles more WLTP range, 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and 60 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Citroën ë-C4 X comes out ahead overall.
The Citroën ë-C4 X is £5,005 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Citroën ë-C4 X comes out roughly £5,085 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 185 miles for the Citroën ë-C4 X and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Nissan ARIYA goes roughly 24 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
The Citroën ë-C4 X is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 50 mm narrower than the Nissan ARIYA. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Citroën ë-C4 X and about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA. The Citroën ë-C4 X also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Citroën ë-C4 X and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Citroën ë-C4 X comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a used Citroën ë-C4 or ë-C4 X: the 50 and 54 kWh versions, the recalls to check, realistic range, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .