In this comparison, BYD ATTO 3 leads on city driving, while the Peugeot e-3008 leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 (2023-2026) if...
Choose the Peugeot e-3008 if...
Our take
The Peugeot e-3008 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Allure
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £36,990 (better) | £37,065 |
| Official range | 261 miles | 326 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 440 L | 588 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.3 sec (better) | 8.8 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,542 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,875 mm (better) | 1,895 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,075 mm (better) | 2,108 mm |
| Height | 1,615 mm | 1,641 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 10.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 525 mm spare (better) | 505 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 3 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L | 588 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1338 L | 1663 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,250 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 3
Peugeot e-3008
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | BYD ATTO 3 Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008 Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.54m+87mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.90m+20mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.08m | 2.11m+33mm |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.64m+26mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.72m | 2.74m+19mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L | 588L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1338L | 1663L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 10.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,750kg (better) | 2,108kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,250kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 60.48kWh | 73kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 261 mi | 326 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 88kW | 160kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £36,990 (better) | £37,065 |
| Price after EV grant | £36,990 (not eligible) | £35,565 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023–2026 | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 261 miles | 326 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 213 miles | 272 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 88 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 147 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 60.5 kWh | 73 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.3 sec (better) | 8.8 sec |
| Power | 150 kW | 157 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 343 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

BYD ATTO 3
Comfort (2023-26)
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Peugeot e-3008
Allure
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3Comfort (2023-26) | Peugeot e-3008Allure |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

BYD ATTO 3
Comfort (2023-26)

Peugeot e-3008
Allure
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 3
Peugeot e-3008
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
BYD ATTO 3
Peugeot e-3008
No active listings.
The BYD ATTO 3 is £75 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the two land within £35 of each other - effectively the same to own. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 213 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 and 272 miles for the Peugeot e-3008 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Peugeot e-3008 goes roughly 59 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-35 minutes.
The two are within 20 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3 and about 505 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-3008.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 92% battery health for the BYD ATTO 3 and 84% for the Peugeot e-3008. That gives the BYD ATTO 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The BYD ATTO 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Peugeot e-3008's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
More Peugeot e-3008 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used BYD Atto 3 buyer’s guide: the original 60 kWh car vs the 2026 Atto 3 EVO, BYD’s long warranty, slow rapid charging, insurance, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Peugeot E-3008 buyer’s guide: Allure and GT, the 73 kWh and Long Range 97 kWh versions, the suspension and door-handle recalls, warranty left, real-world range, the heat pump question, what to pay vs new with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .