Loading comparison
Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) vs Nissan ARIYA
Selected trim35 e-tron · 2021-23Change trim221 mi · 55 kWh · £40,750
At a glance
In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on family practicality and city driving, while the Nissan ARIYA leads on value for money and motorway range.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron (2021-2023) if...
- you need the most family-friendly option with good safety and space
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Audi Q4 e-tron edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
ValueNissan
Audi
5.1
Nissan
5.8
Motorway RangeNissan
Audi
3.7
Nissan
4.3
FamilyAudi
Audi
7.7
Nissan
6.9
Cost Per Mile
Audi
4.8
Nissan
4.6
Too close to call
City DrivingAudi
Audi
6
Nissan
4.7
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
- £3,750 cheaper
- 30 miles more WLTP range
- 30 kW faster rapid charging
- 35 kW more power
- 1.5s quicker 0-62 mph
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,750 | £37,000 (better) |
| Official range | 221 miles | 250 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L (better) | 466 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Audi Q4 e-tron
Nissan ARIYA
Length
Audi Q4 e-tron4,588mm-7mm
Nissan ARIYA4,595mm
Width
Audi Q4 e-tron1,865mm
Nissan ARIYA1,850mm-15mm
Height
Audi Q4 e-tron1,632mm-28mm
Nissan ARIYA1,660mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,595 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm | 1,850 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm (better) | 2,172 mm |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,660 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 11.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare | 550 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L (better) | 466 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L (better) | 1350 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 750 kg |
Full specifications
| Specification |  Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron |  Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.59m+7mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.85m-15mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.17m+64mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.66m+28mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.77m+11mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L (better) | 466L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L (better) | 1350L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 11.5m |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 1,917kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 55kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 221 mi | 250 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,750 | £37,000 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £40,750 (not eligible) | £35,500 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2023 | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 221 miles | 250 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 184 miles | 209 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.2 kW (better) | 7 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh | 63 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9 sec | 7.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 125 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | Not available | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Audi Q4 e-tron 35 e-tron
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant93%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users66%
Safety Assist80%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh
Tested 2022
Adult Occupant86%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users74%
Safety Assist93%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-tron35 e-tron | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag infotainment & software, real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.
Audi Q4 e-tron
35 e-tron
Owners love
- Owners consistently praise the quiet, refined cabin and comfortable ride.
- The interior quality and conventional layout, including physical climate controls, are rated above the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq it is based on.
- Rear passenger space and headroom are generous for the size of car.
Watch out for
- Real-world range falls well short of the WLTP figure, with owners of the 40 typically seeing 230-290 miles in mild weather and around 200 in freezing conditions.
- Efficiency is middling, around 3 miles per kWh on average and much less in cold city driving.
- The myAudi app and in-car software are widely described as limited or awkward, and some cars needed software updates.
Owner tips
- Judge battery health from a full-charge range over several days, not one cold-weather reading: the display is based on recent driving.
- Check whether the car has the optional heat pump if you do a lot of winter driving.
Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
Owners love
- Owners praise the quiet, roomy cabin, the comfortable seats and the interior design.
- The 87 kWh cars give a long range in mild weather, with owners reporting around 280-300 miles.
- Owners who tow find it capable, and the head-up display and 360-degree camera are well liked.
Watch out for
- The infotainment and navigation feel slow and dated, with touch-sensitive buttons that are easy to brush by accident.
- Several owners report 12-volt battery problems, sometimes within the first months.
- Winter range drops noticeably, with one 87 kWh owner seeing the estimate fall from about 330 to 220-230 miles.
Owner tips
- Ask whether the 12-volt battery has been replaced, and consider a cheap 12-volt monitor.
- Use the battery percentage rather than the range estimate, which is unreliable for the first few charges and in winter.
Buying options
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Nissan ARIYA
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi Q4 e-tron
- £19,0412023Car360View
- £18,3932023Car360View
Nissan ARIYA
No active listings.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron worth the extra £3,750 over the Nissan ARIYA?
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £3,750 more than the Nissan ARIYA. For that premium it adds 54 litres more boot space. The Nissan ARIYA is not just cheaper - it also offers 30 miles more WLTP range, 30 kW faster peak rapid charging and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Nissan ARIYA?
The Nissan ARIYA is £3,750 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Nissan ARIYA comes out roughly £3,750 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 184 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Nissan ARIYA goes roughly 25 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Nissan ARIYA?
The two are within 15 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA and about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron. The Audi Q4 e-tron also turns in a 1.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Nissan ARIYA?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 84% for the Nissan ARIYA. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best family EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among the best city EVsWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Audi Q4 e-tron and Nissan ARIYA rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a Used Audi Q4 e-tron (2021 on): 35, 40, 45, 50 or 55, the Recall, Range & What to Check
A used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideBuying a Used Nissan Ariya (2022 on): 63 or 87 kWh, e-4ORCE, Motor Recalls, Range & What to Check
A used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .