In this comparison, Audi e-tron GT stays competitive across the board, while the Polestar 3 leads on family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Polestar 3 if...
Our take
The Polestar 3 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Rear motor
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £79,900 | £76,540 (better) |
| Official range | 303 miles | 375 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 405 L | 484 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 18 min (better) | 22 min |
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,989 mm | 4,900 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,964 mm (better) | 1,968 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,158 mm | 2,120 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,396 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 11.8 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 436 mm spare (better) | 432 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 405 L | 484 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1411 L |
| Frunk | 85 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,500 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi e-tron GT
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Polestar 3
| Specification | Audi e-tron GT quattro 93kWh | Polestar 3 Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.99m | 4.90m-89mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 1.97m+4mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | 2.12m-38mm |
| Height | 1.40m | 1.62m+226mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.98m+85mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 208mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 405L | 484L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1411L |
| Frunk | 85L | Not available |
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 11.8m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,340kg (better) | 2,357kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 93.4kWh (better) | 92kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 303 mi | 375 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 270kW | 310kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £79,900 | £76,540 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2026+ |
* Audi e-tron GT: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 303 miles | 375 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 253 miles | 257 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 18 min (better) | 22 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 270 kW | 310 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 176 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 86 kWh | 92 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 7.5 sec |
| Power | 390 kW (better) | 245 kW |
| Torque | 590 Nm (better) | 480 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi e-tron GT
quattro 93kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Polestar 3
Rear motor
7.1/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Audi e-tron GT quattro 93kWh
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | Polestar 3Rear motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi e-tron GT
Polestar 3
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Audi e-tron GT
No active listings.
Polestar 3
The Audi e-tron GT costs £3,360 more than the Polestar 3. For that premium it adds 145 kW more power and a 3.5s quicker 0-62mph time. The Polestar 3 is not just cheaper - it also offers 71 miles more WLTP range, 40 kW faster peak rapid charging and 79 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Polestar 3 comes out ahead overall.
The Polestar 3 is £3,360 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £192 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Polestar 3 comes out roughly £3,440 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 253 miles for the Audi e-tron GT and 257 miles for the Polestar 3 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 18-22 minutes.
The two are within 4 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 436 mm of total clearance for the Audi e-tron GT and about 432 mm of total clearance for the Polestar 3.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi e-tron GT and 84% for the Polestar 3. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Polestar 3 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi e-tron GT and RS e-tron GT buyer’s guide: the 2021-2024 car vs the 2024 facelift, the high-voltage battery and brake-hose recalls, battery warranty left, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Polestar 3 buyer’s guide: the 2024-2025 111 kWh car vs the 2026 800-volt update, the wiring recall, real-world range, software, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .