In this comparison, Audi e-tron GT leads on charging speed, while the BMW i5 leads on value for money, family practicality and running costs.
Choose the Audi e-tron GT (2021-2024) if...
Choose the BMW i5 if...
Our take
The BMW i5 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
quattro 93kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £79,900 | £67,795 (better) |
| Official range | 303 miles | 357 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 405 L | 490 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 18 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,989 mm | 5,060 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,964 mm | 1,900 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,158 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,396 mm | 1,515 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 12.3 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 436 mm spare | 500 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Boot space (seats up) | 405 L | 490 L (better) |
| Frunk | 85 L | Not available |
| Specification | Audi e-tron GT quattro 93kWh | BMW i5 eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.99m | 5.06m+71mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 1.90m-64mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | Not available |
| Height | 1.40m | 1.51m+119mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 3.00m+95mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 405L | 490L (better) |
| Frunk | 85L | Not available |
| Seats | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 12.3m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,340kg | 2,195kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 93.4kWh (better) | 83.9kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 303 mi | 357 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 270kW (better) | 205kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £79,900 | £67,795 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Coupe | Saloon |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2023+ |
* Audi e-tron GT: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 303 miles | 357 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 253 miles | 297 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 18 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 270 kW (better) | 205 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 86 kWh (better) | 81.2 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V (better) | 400V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 4 sec (better) | 6 sec |
| Power | 390 kW (better) | 250 kW |
| Torque | 590 Nm (better) | 400 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Audi e-tron GT
quattro 93kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

BMW i5
eDrive40 M Sport
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Audi e-tron GT quattro 93kWh
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Tested 2023
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi e-tron GTquattro 93kWh | BMW i5eDrive40 M Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Audi e-tron GT
quattro 93kWh

BMW i5
eDrive40 M Sport
Get a quote
Audi e-tron GT
BMW i5
The Audi e-tron GT costs £12,105 more than the BMW i5. For that premium it adds 65 kW faster peak rapid charging, 140 kW more power and a 2.0s quicker 0-62mph time. The BMW i5 is not just cheaper - it also offers 53 miles more WLTP range, 85 litres more boot space and 1 more seat (5 versus 4). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the BMW i5 comes out ahead overall.
The BMW i5 is £12,105 cheaper to buy. The BMW i5 is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £208 for the Audi e-tron GT, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the BMW i5 comes out roughly £12,345 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 253 miles for the Audi e-tron GT and 297 miles for the BMW i5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BMW i5 goes roughly 44 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 18 minutes in the Audi e-tron GT and 30 in the BMW i5, so the Audi e-tron GT loses less time at each stop. So the BMW i5 stops less often while the Audi e-tron GT stops for less time - pick on which you would rather do.
The BMW i5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 64 mm narrower than the Audi e-tron GT. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 500 mm of total clearance for the BMW i5 and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Audi e-tron GT. The Audi e-tron GT also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi e-tron GT and 84% for the BMW i5. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BMW i5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi e-tron GT and RS e-tron GT buyer’s guide: the 2021-2024 car vs the 2024 facelift, the high-voltage battery and brake-hose recalls, battery warranty left, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used BMW i5 buyer’s guide: eDrive40 or M60, saloon or Touring, the option packs to check, the braking-system recall, battery warranty left, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .