Toyota C-HR+ vs XPENG G6 (2025)

The XPENG G6 costs £5,495 more than the Toyota C-HR+. For that premium it adds 65 kW faster peak rapid charging, 155 litres more boot space and 67 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.

The Toyota C-HR+ is £5,495 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £192 for the XPENG G6, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Toyota C-HR+ comes out roughly £5,775 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ and 193 miles for the XPENG G6 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 42 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 30 minutes in the Toyota C-HR+ and 12 in the XPENG G6, so the XPENG G6 loses less time at each stop. So the Toyota C-HR+ stops less often while the XPENG G6 stops for less time - pick on which you would rather do.

The Toyota C-HR+ is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 50 mm narrower than the XPENG G6. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+ and about 480 mm of total clearance for the XPENG G6. The Toyota C-HR+ also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Toyota C-HR+ and 90% for the XPENG G6. That gives the XPENG G6 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The XPENG G6's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Toyota C-HR+'s NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.