In this comparison, Toyota C-HR+ leads on motorway range, family practicality and running costs, while the Volvo EX30 leads on charging speed and city driving.
Best value
Too close to call
Range & charging
Too close to call
Practicality
Too close to call
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
Choose the Volvo EX30 if...
Our take
The Toyota C-HR+ leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £34,495 | £33,060 (better) |
| Official range | 283 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| Boot space | 416 L (better) | 400 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.4 sec (better) | 9.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,520 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,870 mm | 1,838 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,032 mm |
| Height | 1,595 mm | 1,550 mm |
| Turning circle | 11 m | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 530 mm spare | 562 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 821 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 416 L (better) | 400 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1000 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 7 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
| Specification | Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range | Volvo EX30 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.52m | 4.23m-287mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.84m-32mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.03m |
| Height | 1.59m | 1.55m-45mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.75m | 2.65m-100mm |
| Ground Clearance | 185mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 416L (better) | 400L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1000L |
| Frunk | Not available | 7L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 821mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11m | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,828kg (better) | 1,840kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh (better) | 51kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 283 mi (better) | 209 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £34,495 | £33,060 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £32,995 (-£1,500) | £33,060 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
* Volvo EX30: 11 kW AC on Core and Plus; Ultra has a 22 kW on-board charger.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 283 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 235 miles (better) | 149 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 169 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh (better) | 51 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.4 sec (better) | 9.1 sec |
| Power | 123 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Torque | 269 Nm | 343 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range

Volvo EX30
Single Motor
7.5/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Get a quote
Toyota C-HR+
Volvo EX30
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Toyota C-HR+
No active listings.
Volvo EX30
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £1,435 more than the Volvo EX30. For that premium it adds 73 miles more WLTP range. The Volvo EX30 is not just cheaper - it also offers 77 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.
The Volvo EX30 is £1,435 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £184 for the Volvo EX30, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Volvo EX30 comes out roughly £1,195 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ and 149 miles for the Volvo EX30 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 87 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-30 minutes.
The Volvo EX30 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 32 mm narrower than the Toyota C-HR+. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 562 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX30 and about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Toyota C-HR+ and 90% for the Volvo EX30. That gives the Volvo EX30 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Volvo EX30's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Toyota C-HR+'s NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
More Volvo EX30 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .