Loading comparison
Peugeot e-2008 vs Volvo XC40 Recharge
Selected trimAllure 54kWh 156Change trim246 mi · 54 kWh · £29,565
Selected trimSingle Motor FWD · 2022-23Change trim264 mi · 69 kWh · £46,505
At a glance
The Volvo XC40 Recharge was replaced by the Volvo EX40 in 2024. Compare the Peugeot e-2008 with the Volvo EX40
In this comparison, Peugeot e-2008 leads on value for money, running costs and city driving, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge leads on charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Peugeot e-2008 if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.9p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
Choose the Volvo XC40 Recharge if...
- you need the fastest charging of these options
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Peugeot e-2008 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValuePeugeot
Peugeot
5.8
Volvo
4.8
Motorway Range
Peugeot
4.3
Volvo
3.9
Too close to call
Family
Peugeot
5.9
Volvo
6
Too close to call
ChargingVolvo
Peugeot
1.5
Volvo
3
Cost Per MilePeugeot
Peugeot
8
Volvo
3.8
City DrivingPeugeot
Peugeot
8.1
Volvo
4.8
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
- 30 kW faster rapid charging
- 55 kW more power
- 1.7s quicker 0-62 mph
- 1500 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,565 (better) | £46,505 |
| Official range | 246 miles | 264 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 434 L (better) | 419 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 37 min |
| 0-62 mph | 9.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Peugeot e-2008
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Length
Peugeot e-20084,304mm-121mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge4,425mm
Width
Peugeot e-20081,770mm-93mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge1,863mm
Height
Peugeot e-20081,523mm-124mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge1,647mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,304 mm | 4,425 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,770 mm (better) | 1,863 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,987 mm (better) | 2,034 mm |
| Height | 1,523 mm | 1,647 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 11.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 630 mm spare (better) | 537 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 434 L (better) | 419 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1467 L (better) | 1290 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 31 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Peugeot e-2008
- At 4,304 mm, shorter than 85% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
- 10.4 m turning circle, tighter than 85% of SUVs in our database.
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Peugeot e-2008 Allure 54kWh 156 |  Volvo XC40 Recharge Single Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.30m | 4.42m+121mm |
| Width | 1.77m | 1.86m+93mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.99m | 2.03m+47mm |
| Height | 1.52m | 1.65m+124mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.60m | 2.70m+97mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 175mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 434L (better) | 419L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1467L (better) | 1290L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 11.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,548kg (better) | 2,020kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 54kWh | 69kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 246 mi | 264 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,565 (better) | £46,505 |
| Price after EV grant | £28,065 (-£1,500) | £46,505 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023+ | 2022–2023 |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 246 miles | 264 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 205 miles | 220 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 37 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 7.4 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 51 kWh | 64 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 9.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 115 kW | 170 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 330 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Peugeot e-2008
Allure 54kWh 156
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Peugeot e-2008
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
New and used prices
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £15,295 | £17,500 |
| Average used price | £16,690 | £21,995 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 5 listings | 9 listings (better) |
| Recent used-price trend | Up 7.7% over ~6 months | Down 10.8% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Peugeot e-2008 Allure 54kWh 156
Tested 2019
Adult Occupant91%
Child Occupant84%
Vulnerable Road Users62%
Safety Assist68%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Volvo XC40 Recharge Single Motor FWD
Tested 2018
Adult Occupant97%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users71%
Safety Assist76%
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Peugeot e-2008Allure 54kWh 156 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.
Peugeot e-2008
Allure 54kWh 156
Owners love
- Owners describe it as comfortable, quiet and easy to drive, with relaxing adaptive cruise on the motorway.
- The mix of physical buttons and touchscreen, the 3D dials and the reversing camera get praise.
- Several owners report no faults and no battery degradation over several years.
Watch out for
- Real-world range is well below WLTP, especially in winter without a heat pump; around 130 to 180 miles is commonly reported.
- The MyPeugeot app is widely criticised as unreliable.
- The range estimate on the dash is inconsistent.
Owner tips
- Plan on about 170 to 180 miles in mild weather and much less in winter.
- Use phone mirroring for navigation and voice commands.
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
Owners love
- Excellent ride comfort with well-controlled suspension and compliant handling, even over poor road surfaces
- Outstanding interior quality with premium materials, supportive seats, and thoughtful design details
- Strong dual-motor performance (0-62 mph in 4.7-4.9 seconds) with instant torque and impressive acceleration
Watch out for
- Expensive pricing (£50-60k+) with poor value proposition compared to competitors like Tesla Model Y, Polestar 2, and Skoda Enyaq
- Significant software and infotainment reliability issues including system crashes, navigation failures, and random reboots at highway speeds, reported across multiple owners
- Poor efficiency and heavy weight (504kg heavier than petrol equivalent), resulting in disappointing real-world range of 200-240 miles for advertised 260+ mile capacity
Owner tips
- Choose 19-inch summer tires over 20-inch wheels for noticeably better ride quality and reduced road noise
- Select the twin-motor variant for superior range (334 miles) and faster 200kW charging if budget allows; single motor charges slower at 130kW peak
Buying options
Get a quote
Peugeot e-2008
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Peugeot e-2008
- £15,4902024Anchor CarsView
Volvo XC40 Recharge
- £23,9902023Cars2View
- £22,4992023Browns of RichmondView
Frequently asked questions
Is the Volvo XC40 Recharge worth the extra £16,940 over the Peugeot e-2008?
The Volvo XC40 Recharge costs £16,940 more than the Peugeot e-2008. For that premium it adds 30 kW faster peak rapid charging, 55 kW more power and a 1.7s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Peugeot e-2008 comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Peugeot e-2008 or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
The Peugeot e-2008 is £16,940 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-2008 comes out roughly £17,060 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 205 miles for the Peugeot e-2008 and 220 miles for the Volvo XC40 Recharge - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo XC40 Recharge goes roughly 15 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Peugeot e-2008 or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
The Peugeot e-2008 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 93 mm narrower than the Volvo XC40 Recharge. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 630 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-2008 and about 537 mm of total clearance for the Volvo XC40 Recharge. The Peugeot e-2008 also turns in a 1.0 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Peugeot e-2008 or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Peugeot e-2008 and 84% for the Volvo XC40 Recharge. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Peugeot e-2008 comparisons
More Volvo XC40 Recharge comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best family EVsWhere the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best city EVsWhere the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Peugeot e-2008 and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among EVs with the biggest boots
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideBuying a Used Peugeot e-2008 (2020 on): 50 vs 54 kWh, Recalls & What to Pay
A used Peugeot e-2008 buyer’s guide: the 50 kWh and 54 kWh versions, the power-loss recalls to check, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideBuying a Used Volvo XC40 Recharge (2021-2024): Which Version, Range, Warranty & What to Check
A used Volvo XC40 Recharge buyer’s guide: Twin 78 vs 82 kWh, front vs rear-drive single motor, heat pump by trim, warranty left, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .