In this comparison, Omoda E5 leads on value for money, running costs and city driving, while the Volvo EC40 leads on family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Omoda E5 (2024-2025) if...
Choose the Volvo EC40 if...
Our take
The Omoda E5 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,055 (better) | £46,860 |
| Official range | 257 miles | 300 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 380 L | 404 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 28 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.2 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,424 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,830 mm (better) | 1,873 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,034 mm |
| Height | 1,588 mm | 1,591 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.8 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 570 mm spare (better) | 527 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 917 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Boot space (seats up) | 380 L | 404 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1075 L | 1310 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,500 kg |
| Specification | Omoda E5 Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.42m | 4.44m+16mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.87m+43mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.03m |
| Height | 1.59m | 1.59m+3mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.63m | 2.70m+72mm |
| Ground Clearance | 147mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 380L | 404L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1075L | 1310L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 917mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.8m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,710kg (better) | 2,065kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,500kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 61kWh | 70kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 257 mi | 300 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 80kW | 200kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,055 (better) | £46,860 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024–2025 | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 257 miles | 300 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 194 miles | 206 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 28 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 80 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 160 Wh/km (better) | 167 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 60 kWh | 70 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.2 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
| Power | 155 kW | 175 kW (better) |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 420 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Omoda E5
Comfort (2024-25)
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Volvo EC40
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Omoda E5Comfort (2024-25) | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Omoda E5
Volvo EC40
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Omoda E5
Volvo EC40
No active listings.
The Volvo EC40 costs £13,805 more than the Omoda E5. For that premium it adds 42 miles more WLTP range and 120 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Omoda E5 comes out ahead overall.
The Omoda E5 is £13,805 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £13,845 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 194 miles for the Omoda E5 and 206 miles for the Volvo EC40 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-28 minutes.
The Omoda E5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 43 mm narrower than the Volvo EC40. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EC40.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Omoda E5 and 84% for the Volvo EC40. That gives the Omoda E5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Omoda E5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Volvo EC40's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Omoda E5 comparisons
More Volvo EC40 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Omoda E5 buyer’s guide: the 2024-25 car vs the 2026 update with faster charging, the wheel hub nut recall, the 7-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX40 and EC40 buyer’s guide: Single Motor, Extended Range and Twin Motor compared, real-world range, warranty left, the B-mode braking recall, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .