In this comparison, Nissan ARIYA leads on motorway range, family practicality and running costs, while the Omoda E5 leads on charging speed and city driving.
Best value
Too close to call
Range & charging
Too close to call
Practicality
Too close to call
Choose the Nissan ARIYA if...
Choose the Omoda E5 if...
Our take
The Nissan ARIYA leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £37,000 | £33,065 (better) |
| Official range | 250 miles | 267 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 466 L (better) | 380 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 28 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,595 mm | 4,424 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,850 mm | 1,830 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,172 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,660 mm | 1,588 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.5 m | 10.8 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 550 mm spare | 570 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 466 L (better) | 380 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1350 L (better) | 1075 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
| Specification | Nissan ARIYA Engage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5 Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.42m-171mm |
| Width | 1.85m | 1.83m-20mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.17m | Not available |
| Height | 1.66m | 1.59m-72mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.63m-145mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 147mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 466L (better) | 380L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1350L (better) | 1075L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.5m | 10.8m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,917kg | 1,710kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 61kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 250 mi | 267 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 130kW | 130kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £37,000 | £33,065 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £35,500 (-£1,500) | £33,065 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 250 miles | 267 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 209 miles (better) | 194 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 28 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 130 kW | 130 kW |
| Home AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 160 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 63 kWh (better) | 60 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.5 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 155 kW |
| Torque | 300 Nm (better) | 288 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Nissan ARIYA
Engage+ 63kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Omoda E5
Knight
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Nissan ARIYAEngage+ 63kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Nissan ARIYA
Omoda E5
The Nissan ARIYA costs £3,935 more than the Omoda E5. For that premium it adds 86 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Nissan ARIYA comes out ahead overall.
The Omoda E5 is £3,935 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £168 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £3,895 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 209 miles for the Nissan ARIYA and 194 miles for the Omoda E5 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 28-30 minutes.
The two are within 20 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 550 mm of total clearance for the Nissan ARIYA. The Omoda E5 also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Nissan ARIYA and 90% for the Omoda E5. That gives the Omoda E5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Omoda E5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Nissan ARIYA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Nissan ARIYA comparisons
More Omoda E5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Nissan Ariya buyer’s guide: 63 vs 87 kWh, two-wheel drive vs e-4ORCE and Nismo, the motor and inverter recalls, 12-volt battery problems, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay vs a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Omoda E5 buyer’s guide: the 2024-25 car vs the 2026 update with faster charging, the wheel hub nut recall, the 7-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .