In this comparison, MINI Countryman leads on value for money and motorway range, while the Toyota C-HR+ stays competitive across the board.
Choose the MINI Countryman if...
Our take
The MINI Countryman edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,005 (better) | £34,495 |
| Official range | 310 miles (better) | 283 miles |
| Boot space | 460 L (better) | 416 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 29 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.6 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,445 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,843 mm (better) | 1,870 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,073 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,635 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 11 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 557 mm spare (better) | 530 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | Not available | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 892 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 460 L (better) | 416 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1450 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,200 kg | Not available |
| Specification | MINI Countryman E | Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.45m | 4.52m+75mm |
| Width | 1.84m | 1.87m+27mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.07m | Not available |
| Height | 1.64m | 1.59m-40mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.69m | 2.75m+58mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 185mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 460L (better) | 416L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1450L | Not available |
| Seats | Not available | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 892mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 11m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,940kg | 1,828kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,200kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 65.2kWh (better) | 58kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 310 mi (better) | 283 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 130kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,005 (better) | £34,495 |
| Price after EV grant | £29,255 (-£3,750) (better) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
* MINI Countryman: 11 kW AC is standard; 22 kW AC was an option.
* MINI Countryman: Current figure, for cars delivered from April 2026 after an efficiency update. Earlier cars have less range.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 310 miles (better) | 283 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 258 miles (better) | 235 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 29 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 130 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 65.2 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.6 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 150 kW (better) | 123 kW |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 269 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

MINI Countryman
E

Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | MINI CountrymanE | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
MINI Countryman
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £1,490 more than the MINI Countryman. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The MINI Countryman is not just cheaper - it also offers 27 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Countryman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Countryman is £1,490 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £136 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Countryman comes out roughly £1,450 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 258 miles for the MINI Countryman and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The MINI Countryman goes roughly 23 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 29-30 minutes.
The two are within 27 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 557 mm of total clearance for the MINI Countryman and about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+. The Toyota C-HR+ also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the MINI Countryman and 84% for the Toyota C-HR+. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More MINI Countryman comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .