Loading comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Volvo XC40 Recharge
Selected trim250 · 2021-22Change trim263 mi · 66.5 kWh · £43,495
Selected trimSingle Motor FWD · 2022-23Change trim264 mi · 69 kWh · £46,505
At a glance
The Volvo XC40 Recharge was replaced by the Volvo EX40 in 2024. Compare the Mercedes-Benz EQA with the Volvo EX40
In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA leads on running costs, while the Volvo XC40 Recharge leads on charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 2.2p per mile on off-peak electricity
Choose the Volvo XC40 Recharge if...
- you need the fastest charging of these options
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Mercedes-Benz EQA edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Value
Mercedes-Benz
4.8
Volvo
4.8
Too close to call
Motorway Range
Mercedes-Benz
4.1
Volvo
3.9
Too close to call
Family
Mercedes-Benz
5.6
Volvo
6
Too close to call
ChargingVolvo
Mercedes-Benz
2.5
Volvo
3
Cost Per MileMercedes-Benz
Mercedes-Benz
4.5
Volvo
3.8
City Driving
Mercedes-Benz
5.1
Volvo
4.8
Too close to call
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
- 79 litres more boot space
- 30 kW faster rapid charging
- 30 kW more power
- 750 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 (better) | £46,505 |
| Official range | 263 miles | 264 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 340 L | 419 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min (better) | 37 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Length
Mercedes-Benz EQA4,463mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge4,425mm-38mm
Width
Mercedes-Benz EQA1,834mm-29mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge1,863mm
Height
Mercedes-Benz EQA1,620mm-27mm
Volvo XC40 Recharge1,647mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,425 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm (better) | 1,863 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm (better) | 2,034 mm |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,647 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 11.4 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare (better) | 537 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 419 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L (better) | 1290 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
Full specifications
| Specification |  Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |  Volvo XC40 Recharge Single Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.42m-38mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.86m+29mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.03m+14mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.65m+27mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.70m-27mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 175mm+7mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 419L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L (better) | 1290L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 11.4m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | 2,020kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh | 69kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi | 264 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 (better) | £46,505 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2022–2023 |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles | 264 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles | 220 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min (better) | 37 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 64 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 170 kW (better) |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 330 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
250
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
New and used prices
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £16,278 | £17,500 |
| Average used price | £18,653 | £21,995 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 4 listings | 9 listings (better) |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 1.2% over ~6 months | Down 10.8% over ~6 months |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
Tested 2019
Adult Occupant97%
Child Occupant90%
Vulnerable Road Users81%
Safety Assist75%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Volvo XC40 Recharge Single Motor FWD
Tested 2018
Adult Occupant97%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users71%
Safety Assist76%
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Volvo XC40 RechargeSingle Motor FWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
What owners say
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
250
Owners love
- Owners consistently praise the build quality, quietness and comfort, with very comfortable front seats.
- Real-world range is close to or above the official figure in summer for many owners, with around 3.5 to 4.5 miles per kWh reported.
- Rapid charging holds a high rate for much of the charge, so stops are quick by the standards of its size.
Watch out for
- The car has no built-in charge scheduling, so owners rely on a smart home charger or tariff app for cheap night rates.
- Winter range drops to roughly 200 miles or less, and the range display can be inaccurate.
- The boot is small and rear legroom is tight for tall passengers because of the raised floor.
Owner tips
- Use a smart home charger or tariff app to time charging, as the car cannot.
- Use the D Auto regeneration setting for the best efficiency.
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Single Motor FWD
Owners love
- Excellent ride comfort with well-controlled suspension and compliant handling, even over poor road surfaces
- Outstanding interior quality with premium materials, supportive seats, and thoughtful design details
- Strong dual-motor performance (0-62 mph in 4.7-4.9 seconds) with instant torque and impressive acceleration
Watch out for
- Expensive pricing (£50-60k+) with poor value proposition compared to competitors like Tesla Model Y, Polestar 2, and Skoda Enyaq
- Significant software and infotainment reliability issues including system crashes, navigation failures, and random reboots at highway speeds, reported across multiple owners
- Poor efficiency and heavy weight (504kg heavier than petrol equivalent), resulting in disappointing real-world range of 200-240 miles for advertised 260+ mile capacity
Owner tips
- Choose 19-inch summer tires over 20-inch wheels for noticeably better ride quality and reduced road noise
- Select the twin-motor variant for superior range (334 miles) and faster 200kW charging if budget allows; single motor charges slower at 130kW peak
Buying options
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Volvo XC40 Recharge
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
- £16,6992022Car360View
Volvo XC40 Recharge
- £23,9902023Cars2View
- £22,4992023Browns of RichmondView
Frequently asked questions
Is the Volvo XC40 Recharge worth the extra £3,010 over the Mercedes-Benz EQA?
The Volvo XC40 Recharge costs £3,010 more than the Mercedes-Benz EQA. For that premium it adds 30 kW faster peak rapid charging, 79 litres more boot space and 30 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mercedes-Benz EQA comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
The Mercedes-Benz EQA is £3,010 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Mercedes-Benz EQA comes out roughly £3,010 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 220 miles for the Volvo XC40 Recharge - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-37 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
The two are within 29 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and about 537 mm of total clearance for the Volvo XC40 Recharge.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Volvo XC40 Recharge?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 84% for the Volvo XC40 Recharge. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Volvo XC40 Recharge comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best family EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the best city EVsWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Mercedes-Benz EQA and Volvo XC40 Recharge rank among EVs with the biggest boots
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideUsed Mercedes-Benz EQA buyer's guide (2021-on)
Buying a used Mercedes-Benz EQA: the 250, 250+ and 4MATIC versions, realistic range, the software recalls, what owners report and what to pay in 2026.
GuideBuying a Used Volvo XC40 Recharge (2021-2024): Which Version, Range, Warranty & What to Check
A used Volvo XC40 Recharge buyer’s guide: Twin 78 vs 82 kWh, front vs rear-drive single motor, heat pump by trim, warranty left, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .