In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA leads on motorway range and family practicality, while the Suzuki e VITARA leads on value for money, charging speed and running costs.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if...
Choose the Suzuki e VITARA if...
Our take
The Suzuki e VITARA leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
250
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 | £26,249 (better) |
| Official range | 263 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Boot space | 340 L (better) | 310 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min (better) | 45 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,275 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm | 1,800 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,635 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare | 600 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L (better) | 310 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L (better) | 562 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Suzuki e VITARA
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Suzuki e VITARA Motion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.28m-188mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.80m-34mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | Not available |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.64m+15mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.70m-29mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L (better) | 310L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L (better) | 562L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | 1,680kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh (better) | 49kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi (better) | 213 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 | £26,249 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles (better) | 213 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles (better) | 162 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min (better) | 45 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 149 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 49 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 9.6 sec |
| Power | 140 kW (better) | 106 kW |
| Torque | 375 Nm (better) | 193 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

Suzuki e VITARA
Motion 49kWh
6.3/10
average across 4 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | Suzuki e VITARAMotion 49kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Suzuki e VITARA
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Suzuki e VITARA
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA costs £17,246 more than the Suzuki e VITARA. For that premium it adds 50 miles more WLTP range, 34 kW more power and a 1.5s quicker 0-62mph time. The Suzuki e VITARA is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Suzuki e VITARA comes out ahead overall.
The Suzuki e VITARA is £17,246 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Suzuki e VITARA comes out roughly £17,326 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 162 miles for the Suzuki e VITARA - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQA goes roughly 58 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 30 minutes in the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 45 in the Suzuki e VITARA, so the Mercedes-Benz EQA loses less time at each stop. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQA the stronger long-distance car.
The Suzuki e VITARA is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 34 mm narrower than the Mercedes-Benz EQA. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 600 mm of total clearance for the Suzuki e VITARA and about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA. The Suzuki e VITARA also turns in a 1.0 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 90% for the Suzuki e VITARA. That gives the Suzuki e VITARA a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Suzuki e VITARA's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Mercedes-Benz EQA's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More Suzuki e VITARA comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .