In this comparison, Leapmotor B10 leads on value for money and charging speed, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, family practicality and running costs.
Choose the Leapmotor B10 if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £31,495 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 270 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 430 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 20 min (better) | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,515 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,885 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,655 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.7 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 515 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 430 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1700 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | 25 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Leapmotor B10
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Leapmotor B10 67.1kWh Design | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.51m | 4.66m+143mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.88m-6mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.66m | 1.62m-33mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.77m+31mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 430L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1700L | 1710L (better) |
| Frunk | 25L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.7m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,845kg (better) | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 67.1kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 270 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 168kW (better) | 165kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £31,495 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £31,495 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 270 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 193 miles | 224 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 20 min (better) | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 168 kW (better) | 165 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 174 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 65 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 160 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Leapmotor B10
67.1kWh Design

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Leapmotor B1067.1kWh Design | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Leapmotor B10
67.1kWh Design

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
Get a quote
Leapmotor B10
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Leapmotor B10
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
The Skoda Enyaq costs £7,515 more than the Leapmotor B10. For that premium it adds 155 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Leapmotor B10 is £7,515 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Enyaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £192 for the Leapmotor B10, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Leapmotor B10 comes out roughly £7,355 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 193 miles for the Leapmotor B10 and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 31 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 20-24 minutes.
The two are within 6 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 515 mm of total clearance for the Leapmotor B10. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Leapmotor B10 and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the Leapmotor B10 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Leapmotor B10's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Leapmotor B10 comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .