Loading comparison
Land Rover Range Rover LWB vs Mercedes-Benz EQS
Selected trimSVChange trim372 mi · 118.5 kWh · £215,670
Selected trim400Change trim490 mi · Not available · £91,765
At a glance
In this comparison, Land Rover Range Rover LWB leads on family practicality and charging speed, while the Mercedes-Benz EQS leads on value for money.
Best value
Mercedes-Benz EQSRange & charging
Land Rover Range Rover LWBPracticality
Land Rover Range Rover LWBWhich should you choose?
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover LWB if...
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueMercedes-Benz
Land Rover
4.7
Mercedes-Benz
7.6
Motorway Range
Land Rover
6.9
Mercedes-Benz
7.1
Too close to call
FamilyLand Rover
Land Rover
9.1
Mercedes-Benz
8.1
ChargingLand Rover
Land Rover
9.5
Mercedes-Benz
3.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £215,670 | £91,765 (better) |
| Official range | 372 miles | 490 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 857 L (better) | 610 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 31 min |
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 4.3 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Mercedes-Benz EQS
Length
Land Rover Range Rover LWB5,252mm
Mercedes-Benz EQS5,216mm-36mm
Width
Land Rover Range Rover LWB2,047mm
Mercedes-Benz EQS1,926mm-121mm
Height
Land Rover Range Rover LWB1,870mm
Mercedes-Benz EQS1,512mm-358mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,252 mm | 5,216 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 2,047 mm | 1,926 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,135 mm |
| Height | 1,870 mm | 1,512 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.5 m | 10.9 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 353 mm spare | 474 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 857 L (better) | 610 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 2175 L (better) | 1770 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 2,500 kg (better) | 750 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
- At 5,252 mm, longer than 100% of SUVs we track.
- 2nd-largest boot among SUVs in our catalogue at 857 L.
- 372 mile WLTP range, longer than 85% of SUVs we track.
Mercedes-Benz EQS
- 3rd-largest boot among saloon EVs in our catalogue at 610 L.
- At 5,216 mm, longer than 95% of saloon EVs we track.
- 490 mile WLTP range, longer than 100% of saloon EVs we track.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Land Rover Range Rover LWB SV |  Mercedes-Benz EQS 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.25m | 5.22m-36mm |
| Width | 2.05m | 1.93m-121mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.13m |
| Height | 1.87m | 1.51m-358mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.20m | 3.21m+13mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 143mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 857L* (better) | 610L |
| Boot (seats down) | 2175L (better) | 1770L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.54m | 10.9m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | Not available | 2,660kg |
| Towing Capacity | 2,500kg (better) | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 118.5kWh | Not available |
| Range (WLTP) | 372 mi | 490 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 350kW | Not available |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £215,670 | £91,765 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | suv | Saloon |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Inferred from the ICE Range Rover LWB (5-seat); not yet confirmed for the EV, which may differ slightly due to battery packaging.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources reporting the long-wheelbase Range Rover Electric; matches the ICE Range Rover LWB body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover LWB platform.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 372 miles | 490 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 310 miles | 392 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 31 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 350 kW | Not available |
| Home AC charging | Not available | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 118.5 kWh | Not available |
| Battery chemistry | Not available | NMC |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 4.3 sec |
| Power | Not available | 270 kW |
| Torque | Not available | 858 Nm |
| Drivetrain | Not available | AWD |
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
All 1 video
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Mercedes-Benz EQS 400
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant96%
Child Occupant91%
Vulnerable Road Users76%
Safety Assist80%
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV | Mercedes-Benz EQS400 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 10 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 250,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Mercedes-Benz EQS
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Land Rover Range Rover LWB worth the extra £123,905 over the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB costs £123,905 more than the Mercedes-Benz EQS. For that premium it adds 247 litres more boot space. The Mercedes-Benz EQS is not just cheaper - it also offers 118 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Land Rover Range Rover LWB comes out ahead overall.
What are the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 310 miles for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and 392 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQS - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mercedes-Benz EQS goes roughly 82 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Land Rover Range Rover LWB or the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
The Mercedes-Benz EQS is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 121 mm narrower than the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 474 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQS and about 353 mm of total clearance for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. The Mercedes-Benz EQS also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Land Rover Range Rover LWB comparisons
More Mercedes-Benz EQS comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among the best family EVsWhere the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among long-range EVsWhere the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among the best city EVsWhere the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Land Rover Range Rover LWB and Mercedes-Benz EQS rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .