Loading comparison
Jeep Avenger vs Toyota C-HR+
Selected trimLongitudeChange trim249 mi · 54 kWh · £29,999
Selected trimStandard RangeChange trim283 mi · 58 kWh · £34,495
At a glance
In this comparison, Jeep Avenger leads on city driving, while the Toyota C-HR+ leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Jeep Avenger if...
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you need the most family-friendly option with good safety and space
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Toyota C-HR+ wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
ValueToyota
Jeep
5.4
Toyota
6.3
Motorway RangeToyota
Jeep
3.4
Toyota
5
FamilyToyota
Jeep
4.4
Toyota
6.6
ChargingToyota
Jeep
3
Toyota
4.4
Cost Per MileToyota
Jeep
4.8
Toyota
9.1
City DrivingJeep
Jeep
7.8
Toyota
5.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,999 (better) | £34,495 |
| Official range | 249 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 380 L | 416 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 8.4 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Jeep Avenger
Toyota C-HR+
Length
Jeep Avenger4,080mm-440mm
Toyota C-HR+4,520mm
Width
Jeep Avenger1,810mm-60mm
Toyota C-HR+1,870mm
Height
Jeep Avenger1,530mm-65mm
Toyota C-HR+1,595mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,080 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,810 mm (better) | 1,870 mm |
| Height | 1,530 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 590 mm spare (better) | 530 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | Not available | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 380 L | 416 L (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Jeep Avenger
- At 4,080 mm, shorter than 95% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
- 10.5 m turning circle, tighter than 80% of SUVs in our database.
Toyota C-HR+
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Jeep Avenger Longitude |  Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.08m | 4.52m+440mm |
| Width | 1.81m | 1.87m+60mm |
| Height | 1.53m | 1.59m+65mm |
| Wheelbase | Not available | 2.75m |
| Ground Clearance | 200mm | 185mm-15mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 380L | 416L (better) |
| Seats | Not available | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,552kg (better) | 1,828kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 54kWh | 58kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 249 mi | 283 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,999 (better) | £34,495 |
| Price after EV grant | £28,499 (-£1,500) (better) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023+ | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 249 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 171 miles | 235 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 155 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 54 kWh | 58 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 8.4 sec |
| Power | 115 kW | 123 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 269 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Jeep Avenger
Longitude
Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Jeep Avenger
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Jeep Avenger Longitude
Tested 2024
Adult Occupant79%
Child Occupant70%
Vulnerable Road Users59%
Safety Assist53%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant85%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users86%
Safety Assist79%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Jeep AvengerLongitude | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Jeep Avenger
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Toyota C-HR+
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Jeep Avenger
- £18,4502025Cars2View
- £15,7952024Drive GreenView
- £13,8952023Drive GreenView
Toyota C-HR+
No active listings.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Toyota C-HR+ worth the extra £4,496 over the Jeep Avenger?
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £4,496 more than the Jeep Avenger. For that premium it adds 34 miles more WLTP range and 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Jeep Avenger or the Toyota C-HR+?
The Jeep Avenger is £4,496 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the Jeep Avenger, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Jeep Avenger comes out roughly £4,336 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 171 miles for the Jeep Avenger and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 64 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 30-30 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Jeep Avenger or the Toyota C-HR+?
The Jeep Avenger is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 60 mm narrower than the Toyota C-HR+. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 590 mm of total clearance for the Jeep Avenger and about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+. The Jeep Avenger also turns in a 0.5 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Jeep Avenger or the Toyota C-HR+?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Jeep Avenger and 84% for the Toyota C-HR+. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Jeep Avenger comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the cheapest EVs after the grantWhere the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best city EVsWhere the Jeep Avenger and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the cheapest EVs to run
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .