In this comparison, Jaguar I-Pace leads on family practicality, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, motorway range and charging speed.
Choose the Jaguar I-Pace if...
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £66,350 | £39,010 (better) |
| Official range | 292 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 656 L (better) | 585 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 4.8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,682 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,895 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,139 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,565 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 12 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 505 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 656 L (better) | 585 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1453 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | 27 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Jaguar I-Pace
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Jaguar I-Pace EV400 S | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.68m | 4.66m-24mm |
| Width | 1.90m | 1.88m-16mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.14m | 2.15m+9mm |
| Height | 1.56m | 1.62m+57mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.99m | 2.77m-224mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 656L (better) | 585L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1453L | 1710L (better) |
| Frunk | 27L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.98m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,208kg | 2,084kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 90kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £66,350 | £39,010 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £66,350 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 244 miles (better) | 224 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 84.7 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 4.8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 294 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 696 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Jaguar I-Pace
EV400 S
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2018
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Jaguar I-PaceEV400 S | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Jaguar I-Pace
EV400 S

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
Get a quote
Jaguar I-Pace
Skoda Enyaq
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Jaguar I-Pace
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
The Jaguar I-Pace costs £27,340 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 71 litres more boot space, 144 kW more power and a 3.3s quicker 0-62mph time. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 65 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £27,340 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Enyaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £208 for the Jaguar I-Pace, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £27,580 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 244 miles for the Jaguar I-Pace and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Jaguar I-Pace goes roughly 19 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 16 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 505 mm of total clearance for the Jaguar I-Pace. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Jaguar I-Pace and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Jaguar I-Pace comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .