In this comparison, Hyundai IONIQ 6 N leads on value for money, while the Volvo EX90 leads on motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N if...
Choose the Volvo EX90 (2024-2025) if...
Our take
The Volvo EX90 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Base
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £65,800 (better) | £96,255 |
| Official range | 303 miles | 374 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 371 L (better) | 324 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 18 min (better) | 22 min |
| 0-62 mph | 3.2 sec (better) | 5.5 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,935 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,940 mm (better) | 1,964 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,144 mm | 2,113 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,495 mm | 1,744 mm |
| Turning circle | 12 m | 12 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 460 mm spare (better) | 436 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 926 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 371 L (better) | 324 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 2082 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 46 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 2,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Hyundai IONIQ 6 N
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Volvo EX90
| Specification | Hyundai IONIQ 6 N Base | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.93m | 5.04m+102mm |
| Width | 1.94m | 1.96m+24mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.14m | 2.11m-31mm |
| Height | 1.50m | 1.74m+249mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.96m | 2.98m+20mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 371L (better) | 324L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 2082L |
| Frunk | Not available | 46L |
| Seats | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 926mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12m | 12m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,201kg (better) | 2,725kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 2,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 84kWh | 111kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 303 mi | 374 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 350kW (better) | 250kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £65,800 (better) | £96,255 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024–2025 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 303 miles | 374 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 252 miles | 312 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 18 min (better) | 22 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 350 kW (better) | 250 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 84 kWh | 107 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NCMA | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V | 800V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 3.2 sec (better) | 5.5 sec |
| Power | 478 kW (better) | 300 kW |
| Torque | 770 Nm (better) | 670 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Hyundai IONIQ 6 N
Base

Volvo EX90
Twin Motor 111kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Hyundai IONIQ 6 NBase | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Hyundai IONIQ 6 N
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 costs £30,455 more than the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N. For that premium it adds 71 miles more WLTP range and 2 more seats (7 versus 5). The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N is not just cheaper - it also offers 100 kW faster peak rapid charging, 178 kW more power and a 2.3s quicker 0-62mph time. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo EX90 comes out ahead overall.
The Hyundai IONIQ 6 N is £30,455 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £192 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N comes out roughly £30,495 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 252 miles for the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N and 312 miles for the Volvo EX90 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo EX90 goes roughly 60 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 18-22 minutes.
The two are within 24 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 460 mm of total clearance for the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX90.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 89% battery health for the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N and 84% for the Volvo EX90. That gives the Hyundai IONIQ 6 N a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Hyundai IONIQ 6 N comparisons
More Volvo EX90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Fiat Grande Panda
Pop
£44,805 less to buy
Costs noticeably less if both of these stretch your budget.
More boot spaceSkoda Peaq
SE L 90
+519 L of boot space
Carries more if you need extra luggage room.
Easier to parkHyundai INSTER
Cross
109 cm shorter
Shorter and easier to park on tight city streets.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .