Loading comparison
GWM ORA ORA 03 (2022-2024) vs Toyota C-HR+
Selected trimFunky Cat First Edition · 2022-24Change trim193 mi · 48 kWh · £30,495
Selected trimStandard RangeChange trim283 mi · 58 kWh · £34,495
At a glance
In this comparison, GWM ORA ORA 03 leads on city driving, while the Toyota C-HR+ leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Which should you choose?
Choose the GWM ORA ORA 03 (2022-2024) if...
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
Choose the Toyota C-HR+ if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you need the most family-friendly option with good safety and space
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.7p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Toyota C-HR+ wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
ValueToyota
GWM ORA
4.9
Toyota
6.3
Motorway RangeToyota
GWM ORA
3.5
Toyota
5
FamilyToyota
GWM ORA
5
Toyota
6.6
ChargingToyota
GWM ORA
1.5
Toyota
4.4
Cost Per MileToyota
GWM ORA
4.8
Toyota
9.1
City DrivingGWM ORA
GWM ORA
6.5
Toyota
5.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
- 90 miles more WLTP range
- 188 litres more boot space
- 86 kW faster rapid charging
- 13 min quicker 10-80% rapid charge
- 5.0s quicker 0-62 mph
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £30,495 (better) | £34,495 |
| Official range | 193 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 228 L | 416 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 43 min | 30 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 13.4 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
GWM ORA ORA 03
Toyota C-HR+
Length
GWM ORA ORA 034,235mm-285mm
Toyota C-HR+4,520mm
Width
GWM ORA ORA 031,825mm-45mm
Toyota C-HR+1,870mm
Height
GWM ORA ORA 031,603mm
Toyota C-HR+1,595mm-8mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,235 mm | 4,520 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,825 mm (better) | 1,870 mm |
| Height | 1,603 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.2 m | 11 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 575 mm spare (better) | 530 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 228 L | 416 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 858 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | Not available |
Full specifications
| Specification |  GWM ORA ORA 03 Funky Cat First Edition |  Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.24m | 4.52m+285mm |
| Width | 1.82m | 1.87m+45mm |
| Height | 1.60m | 1.59m-8mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.65m | 2.75m+100mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 185mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 228L | 416L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 858L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.2m | 11m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,540kg (better) | 1,828kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 48kWh | 58kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 193 mi | 283 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 64kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £30,495 (better) | £34,495 |
| Price after EV grant | £30,495 (not eligible) | £32,995 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | SUV |
| Available | 2022–2024 | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 193 miles | 283 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 160 miles | 235 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 43 min | 30 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 64 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 6.6 kW | 11 kW (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 48 kWh | 58 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 13.4 sec | 8.4 sec (better) |
| Power | 126 kW (better) | 123 kW |
| Torque | 250 Nm | 269 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
GWM ORA ORA 03
Funky Cat First Edition
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Toyota C-HR+
Standard Range
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - GWM ORA ORA 03 Funky Cat First Edition
Tested 2022
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Toyota C-HR+ Standard Range
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant85%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users86%
Safety Assist79%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | GWM ORA ORA 03Funky Cat First Edition | Toyota C-HR+Standard Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
GWM ORA ORA 03
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Toyota C-HR+
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Toyota C-HR+ worth the extra £4,000 over the GWM ORA ORA 03?
The Toyota C-HR+ costs £4,000 more than the GWM ORA ORA 03. For that premium it adds 90 miles more WLTP range, 86 kW faster peak rapid charging and 188 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Toyota C-HR+ comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the Toyota C-HR+?
The GWM ORA ORA 03 is £4,000 cheaper to buy. The Toyota C-HR+ is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £168 for the GWM ORA ORA 03, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the GWM ORA ORA 03 comes out roughly £3,840 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 160 miles for the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 235 miles for the Toyota C-HR+ - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota C-HR+ goes roughly 75 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 43 minutes in the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 30 in the Toyota C-HR+, so the Toyota C-HR+ loses less time at each stop. That makes the Toyota C-HR+ the stronger long-distance car.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the Toyota C-HR+?
The GWM ORA ORA 03 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 45 mm narrower than the Toyota C-HR+. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 575 mm of total clearance for the GWM ORA ORA 03 and about 530 mm of total clearance for the Toyota C-HR+.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the GWM ORA ORA 03 or the Toyota C-HR+?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the GWM ORA ORA 03 and 84% for the Toyota C-HR+. That gives the GWM ORA ORA 03 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The GWM ORA ORA 03's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Toyota C-HR+'s NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More GWM ORA ORA 03 comparisons
More Toyota C-HR+ comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best family EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among EVs under £40,000Where the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the best city EVsWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the GWM ORA ORA 03 and Toyota C-HR+ rank among EVs with the biggest boots
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .