In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money and city driving, while the Toyota bZ4X leads on family practicality.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Choose the Toyota bZ4X if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 (better) | £39,995 |
| Official range | 259 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 452 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,690 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm (better) | 1,860 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,650 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m (better) | 11.2 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare (better) | 540 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 452 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 750 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota bZ4X
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | Toyota bZ4X Icon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.69m+377mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.86m+55mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | Not available |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.65m+95mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.85m+262mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | 177mm+20mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 452L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L | Not available |
| Frunk | 43L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m (better) | 11.2m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,870kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 750kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh | 57.7kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi | 276 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 (better) | £39,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £39,995 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles | 276 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles | 230 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh | 54 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 124 kW | 125 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm (better) | 269 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

Toyota bZ4X
Icon FWD 57.7kWh
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | Toyota bZ4XIcon FWD 57.7kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota bZ4X
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Toyota bZ4X
No active listings.
The Toyota bZ4X costs £10,000 more than the Ford Puma Gen-E. For that premium it adds 50 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Ford Puma Gen-E is not just cheaper - it also offers 114 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £10,000 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £10,000 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 230 miles for the Toyota bZ4X - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Toyota bZ4X goes roughly 43 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-30 minutes.
The Ford Puma Gen-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 55 mm narrower than the Toyota bZ4X. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E and about 540 mm of total clearance for the Toyota bZ4X. The Ford Puma Gen-E also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the Toyota bZ4X. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Toyota bZ4X comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Ford Puma Gen-E buyer’s guide: the 43 kWh launch car vs the 2026 46.8 kWh update, real-world range, recalls, warranty left, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Toyota bZ4X buyer’s guide: the 2022-2025 car vs the 2026 update, FWD vs AWD, 6.6 or 11 kW charging, recalls, Toyota’s service-activated warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .