In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on value for money and family practicality, while the MINI Cooper leads on charging speed and city driving.
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E if...
Choose the MINI Cooper if...
Our take
The Ford Puma Gen-E edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 | £26,155 (better) |
| Official range | 259 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Boot space | 566 L (better) | 210 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min (better) | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.8 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 3,858 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm | 1,756 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm (better) | 1,944 mm |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,460 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m | 10.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare | 644 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm (better) | 778 mm |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L (better) | 210 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L (better) | 800 L |
| Frunk | 43 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
MINI Cooper
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Ford Puma Gen-E Select | MINI Cooper Cooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 3.86m-455mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.76m-49mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | 1.94m+14mm |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.46m-95mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.53m-62mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L (better) | 210L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L (better) | 800L |
| Frunk | 43L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm (better) | 778mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m | 10.4m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 1,615kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 46.8kWh (better) | 40.7kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 259 mi (better) | 190 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 75kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 | £26,155 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £26,245 (-£3,750) | £26,155 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 259 miles (better) | 190 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 186 miles (better) | 158 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min (better) | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 75 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 130 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 46.8 kWh (better) | 36.6 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.8 sec (better) |
| Power | 124 kW | 135 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Puma Gen-E
Select

MINI Cooper
Cooper E
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Current pricing and recent used-market behaviour.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Used market price from | £17,999 | £28,900 |
| Average used price | £20,750 | £28,900 |
| Active used listings trackedIndependent UK dealer listings seen in the last 90 days. | 10 listings (better) | 2 listings |
| Saving vs RRP | £9,245 below new | At or above new price |
| Recent used-price trend | Down 23.4% over ~6 months | Broadly flat |
Used prices are indicative figures gathered from independent UK dealer listings and change frequently.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect | MINI CooperCooper E |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
MINI Cooper
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
MINI Cooper
The Ford Puma Gen-E costs £3,840 more than the MINI Cooper. For that premium it adds 69 miles more WLTP range, 25 kW faster peak rapid charging and 356 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Cooper is £3,840 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Cooper comes out roughly £3,840 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 186 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 158 miles for the MINI Cooper - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Puma Gen-E goes roughly 28 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 26-28 minutes.
The MINI Cooper is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 49 mm narrower than the Ford Puma Gen-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 644 mm of total clearance for the MINI Cooper and about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the MINI Cooper. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More MINI Cooper comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Ford Puma Gen-E buyer’s guide: the 43 kWh launch car vs the 2026 46.8 kWh update, real-world range, recalls, warranty left, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used 2024-on MINI Cooper E and Cooper SE buyer’s guide: 40.7 vs 54.2 kWh, how to tell it from the older MINI Electric, the battery and brake recalls, warranty, real-world range, what to pay against new stock and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .