In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E leads on family practicality, while the Volvo ES90 leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs.
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if...
Choose the Volvo ES90 if...
Our take
The Volvo ES90 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Single Motor Extended Range
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £50,840 (better) | £67,560 |
| Official range | 292 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 402 L | 424 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec | 6.6 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 5,000 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm (better) | 1,942 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm (better) | 2,120 mm |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,549 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m (better) | 12 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare (better) | 458 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm (better) | 899 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 424 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | 1427 L (better) |
| Frunk | 100 L (better) | 27 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,600 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo ES90
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD | Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 5.00m+287mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.94m+12mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | 2.12m+23mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.55m-75mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 3.10m+118mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 424L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | 1427L (better) |
| Frunk | 100L (better) | 27L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm (better) | 899mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m (better) | 12m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg (better) | 2,410kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,600kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 72.6kWh | 92kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 292 mi | 409 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £50,840 (better) | £67,560 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2024+ | 2026+ |
* Volvo ES90: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 292 miles | 409 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 210 miles | 286 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km | 158 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 72.6 kWh | 92 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec | 6.6 sec (better) |
| Power | 197 kW | 245 kW (better) |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 480 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD

Volvo ES90
Single Motor Extended Range
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Volvo ES90 Single Motor Extended Range
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD | Volvo ES90Single Motor Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo ES90
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Volvo ES90
No active listings.
The Volvo ES90 costs £16,720 more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. For that premium it adds 117 miles more WLTP range, 200 kW faster peak rapid charging and 48 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo ES90 comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is £16,720 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out roughly £16,640 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 286 miles for the Volvo ES90 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Volvo ES90 goes roughly 76 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 22 in the Volvo ES90, so the Volvo ES90 loses less time at each stop. That makes the Volvo ES90 the stronger long-distance car.
The two are within 12 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and about 458 mm of total clearance for the Volvo ES90. The Ford Mustang Mach-E also turns in a 0.4 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Volvo ES90. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Volvo ES90's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Volvo ES90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .