In this comparison, Ford Mustang Mach-E stays competitive across the board, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
SE L 60
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £40,350 | £39,010 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 402 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,713 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,930 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,097 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,624 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 470 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 997 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 402 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1420 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | 100 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,000 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Skoda Enyaq
| Specification | Ford Mustang Mach-E Standard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.71m | 4.66m-55mm |
| Width | 1.93m | 1.88m-51mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.10m | 2.15m+51mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.62m-2mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.98m | 2.77m-218mm |
| Ground Clearance | 116mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 402L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1420L | 1710L (better) |
| Frunk | 100L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 997mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,166kg | 2,084kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 70kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 115kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £40,350 | £39,010 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £40,350 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2021–2024 | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 203 miles | 224 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 115 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 179 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 70 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.7 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 198 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 525 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Standard Range RWD (2021-24)
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2021
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Mustang Mach-EStandard Range RWD (2021-24) | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Standard Range RWD (2021-24)

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
Get a quote
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Skoda Enyaq
The Ford Mustang Mach-E costs £1,340 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 48 kW more power and a 1.4s quicker 0-62mph time. The Skoda Enyaq is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 183 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Skoda Enyaq is £1,340 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Enyaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £160 a year versus £192 for the Ford Mustang Mach-E, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £1,500 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 203 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 22 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 24 in the Skoda Enyaq, so the Skoda Enyaq loses less time at each stop. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the stronger long-distance car.
The Skoda Enyaq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 51 mm narrower than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .