In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on motorway range, running costs and city driving, while the Smart #5 leads on family practicality.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the Smart #5 if...
Our take
The Ford Explorer leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Pro
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £39,800 |
| Official range | 273 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L | 630 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 6.9 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,695 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,920 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,169 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,705 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | Not available |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 480 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L | 630 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L | 1530 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 47 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,600 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Explorer
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Smart #5
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Smart #5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.70m+227mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.92m+48mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.17m+106mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.71m+75mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.90m+133mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | 190mm-3mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L | 630L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L | 1530L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 47L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | Not available |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,200kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,600kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 76kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 288 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 150kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £39,800 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £39,800 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 288 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 202 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km (better) | 185 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 76 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 6.9 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 250 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 373 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Smart #5
Pro
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Smart #5Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Smart #5
Pro
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Smart #5
The Smart #5 costs £4,615 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 45 kW faster peak rapid charging, 160 litres more boot space and 110 kW more power. The Ford Explorer is not just cheaper - it also offers lower energy use, 164 versus 185 Wh/km. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Explorer is £4,615 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £4,735 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 202 miles for the Smart #5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Smart #5 goes roughly 19 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
The Ford Explorer is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 48 mm narrower than the Smart #5. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 480 mm of total clearance for the Smart #5.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the Smart #5. That gives the Smart #5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Smart #5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Explorer's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Smart #5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .