In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Peugeot e-Rifter counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Our take
The Ford Explorer leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Style 58kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £32,875 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 172 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L | 775 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 11.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,405 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,921 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm (better) | 2,107 mm |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,818 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.8 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 479 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L | 775 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L | Not available |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 750 kg |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Peugeot e-Rifter Allure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.41m-63mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.92m+49mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | 2.11m+44mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.82m+188mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.79m+18mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | 167mm-26mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L | 775L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.8m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg | Not available |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | 750kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh (better) | 50kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 172 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW (better) | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £32,875 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £32,875 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | MPV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2021–2024 |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 172 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles (better) | 144 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.4 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh (better) | 50 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 11.7 sec |
| Power | 140 kW (better) | 100 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 270 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Peugeot e-Rifter
Allure Premium 50kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2018
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Peugeot e-RifterAllure Premium 50kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Peugeot e-Rifter
The Ford Explorer costs £2,310 more than the Peugeot e-Rifter. For that premium it adds 101 miles more WLTP range, 40 kW more power and a 3.7s quicker 0-62mph time. The Peugeot e-Rifter is not just cheaper - it also offers 305 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead overall.
The Peugeot e-Rifter is £2,310 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-Rifter comes out roughly £2,190 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 144 miles for the Peugeot e-Rifter - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Ford Explorer goes roughly 40 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-30 minutes.
The Ford Explorer is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 49 mm narrower than the Peugeot e-Rifter. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 479 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-Rifter.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 84% for the Peugeot e-Rifter. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Peugeot e-Rifter comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used buyer’s guide to the electric Citroën ë-Berlingo, Peugeot e-Rifter, Vauxhall Combo-e Life and Toyota Proace City Verso: the 50 kWh and 52 kWh generations, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .