In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on family practicality, while the Omoda E5 leads on running costs and city driving.
Best value
Too close to call
Range & charging
Too close to call
Practicality
Too close to call
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
Choose the Omoda E5 if...
Our take
The Omoda E5 edges ahead overall, but it's close - check which categories matter most to you.
Too close to call
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 | £33,065 (better) |
| Official range | 273 miles (better) | 267 miles |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 380 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,424 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm | 1,830 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,588 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m | 10.8 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare | 570 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 380 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L (better) | 1075 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | Not available |
| Specification | Ford Explorer Style 58kWh | Omoda E5 Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.42m-44mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.83m-42mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | Not available |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.59m-42mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.63m-137mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | 147mm-46mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 380L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L (better) | 1075L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m | 10.8m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg | 1,710kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 61kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi (better) | 267 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 | £33,065 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £33,065 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles (better) | 267 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 194 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | 160 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 60 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 155 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 288 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh

Omoda E5
Knight
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2024
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Omoda E5Knight |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Omoda E5
The Ford Explorer costs £2,120 more than the Omoda E5. For that premium it adds 90 litres more boot space. The Omoda E5 is not just cheaper - it also offers 25 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Omoda E5 comes out ahead overall.
The Omoda E5 is £2,120 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £2,120 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 194 miles for the Omoda E5 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-28 minutes.
The Omoda E5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 42 mm narrower than the Ford Explorer. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the Omoda E5. That gives the Omoda E5 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Omoda E5's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Explorer's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Omoda E5 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used electric Ford Explorer buyer’s guide: Standard and Extended Range, RWD and AWD explained, the 2026 battery change, recalls, warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay against a new one with the grant, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Omoda E5 buyer’s guide: the 2024-25 car vs the 2026 update with faster charging, the wheel hub nut recall, the 7-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .