Loading comparison
Ford Explorer vs Mazda 6e
Selected trimTakumiChange trim348 mi · 78 kWh · £38,995
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford Explorer leads on city driving, while the Mazda 6e leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Ford Explorer if...
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
Choose the Mazda 6e if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.9p per mile on off-peak electricity
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Mazda 6e leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueMazda
Ford
6.1
Mazda
6.8
Motorway RangeMazda
Ford
3.5
Mazda
6.2
Family
Ford
6.7
Mazda
6.5
Too close to call
Charging
Ford
4.6
Mazda
5
Too close to call
Cost Per MileMazda
Ford
3.5
Mazda
7.5
City DrivingFord
Ford
5.4
Mazda
2.9
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £35,185 (better) | £38,995 |
| Official range | 273 miles | 348 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 470 L (better) | 336 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.9 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford Explorer
Mazda 6e
Length
Ford Explorer4,468mm-453mm
Mazda 6e4,921mm
Width
Ford Explorer1,872mm-18mm
Mazda 6e1,890mm
Height
Ford Explorer1,630mm
Mazda 6e1,491mm-139mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,468 mm | 4,921 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,872 mm (better) | 1,890 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,063 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,630 mm | 1,491 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 528 mm spare (better) | 510 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 916 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 4 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 470 L (better) | 336 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1460 L | Not available |
| Frunk | Not available | 72 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | Not available |
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford Explorer Style 58kWh |  Mazda 6e Takumi |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.47m | 4.92m+453mm |
| Width | 1.87m | 1.89m+18mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.06m | Not available |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.49m-139mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.90m+128mm |
| Ground Clearance | 193mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 470L (better) | 336L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1460L | Not available |
| Frunk | Not available | 72L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 916mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,908kg (better) | 2,027kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 58kWh | 78kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 273 mi | 348 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 105kW | 195kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £35,185 (better) | £38,995 |
| Price after EV grant | £33,685 (-£1,500) | £38,995 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 273 miles | 348 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 183 miles | 290 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 105 kW | 195 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 164 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 58 kWh | 78 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec | 7.9 sec (better) |
| Power | 140 kW | 190 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 290 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Ford Explorer
Style 58kWh
Mazda 6e
Takumi
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Ford Explorer
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford Explorer Style 58kWh
Tested 2024
Adult Occupant89%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users80%
Safety Assist72%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Mazda 6e Takumi
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant93%
Child Occupant93%
Vulnerable Road Users74%
Safety Assist77%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford ExplorerStyle 58kWh | Mazda 6eTakumi |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | Not available |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | Not available |
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford Explorer
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Mazda 6e
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Mazda 6e worth the extra £3,810 over the Ford Explorer?
The Mazda 6e costs £3,810 more than the Ford Explorer. For that premium it adds 75 miles more WLTP range, 90 kW faster peak rapid charging and 50 kW more power. The Ford Explorer is not just cheaper - it also offers 134 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mazda 6e comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford Explorer or the Mazda 6e?
The Ford Explorer is £3,810 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Explorer comes out roughly £3,690 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 183 miles for the Ford Explorer and 290 miles for the Mazda 6e - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mazda 6e goes roughly 107 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-25 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford Explorer or the Mazda 6e?
The two are within 18 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 528 mm of total clearance for the Ford Explorer and about 510 mm of total clearance for the Mazda 6e. The Ford Explorer also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Ford Explorer or the Mazda 6e?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Explorer and 90% for the Mazda 6e. That gives the Mazda 6e a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Mazda 6e's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Ford Explorer's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Explorer comparisons
More Mazda 6e comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among the best city EVsWhere the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Ford Explorer and Mazda 6e rank among EVs with the biggest boots
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .