Loading comparison
Ford E-Tourneo Custom vs Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Selected trimTitaniumChange trim202 mi · 71 kWh · £46,050
Selected trimSVChange trim372 mi · 118.5 kWh · £215,670
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford E-Tourneo Custom counters with the lowest price, while the Land Rover Range Rover LWB leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Best value
Too close to call
Range & charging
Land Rover Range Rover LWBPracticality
Land Rover Range Rover LWBWhich should you choose?
Choose the Land Rover Range Rover LWB if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Value
Ford
4.8
Land Rover
4.7
Too close to call
Motorway RangeLand Rover
Ford
1.6
Land Rover
6.9
FamilyLand Rover
Ford
7.7
Land Rover
9.1
ChargingLand Rover
Ford
5.1
Land Rover
9.5
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Ford E-Tourneo Custom
Titanium
- £169,620 cheaper
- 903 litres more boot space
- 0.6 m tighter turning circle
- 4 more seats
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
SV
- 170 miles more WLTP range
- 200 kW faster rapid charging
- 500 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CustomTitanium | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £46,050 (better) | £215,670 |
| Official range | 202 miles | 372 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 1760 L (better) | 857 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 41 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 12 sec | Not available |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford E-Tourneo Custom
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Length
Ford E-Tourneo Custom5,050mm-202mm
Land Rover Range Rover LWB5,252mm
Width
Ford E-Tourneo Custom2,032mm-15mm
Land Rover Range Rover LWB2,047mm
Height
Ford E-Tourneo Custom1,960mm
Land Rover Range Rover LWB1,870mm-90mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CustomTitanium | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,050 mm | 5,252 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 2,032 mm (better) | 2,047 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,216 mm | Not available |
| Height | 1,960 mm | 1,870 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.9 m (better) | 11.5 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 368 mm spare (better) | 353 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CustomTitanium | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 1760 L (better) | 857 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 2175 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 2,000 kg | 2,500 kg (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford E-Tourneo Custom
- 1st-largest boot among MPVs in our catalogue at 1,760 L.
- At 5,050 mm, longer than 80% of MPVs we track.
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
- At 5,252 mm, longer than 100% of SUVs we track.
- 2nd-largest boot among SUVs in our catalogue at 857 L.
- 372 mile WLTP range, longer than 85% of SUVs we track.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford E-Tourneo Custom Titanium |  Land Rover Range Rover LWB SV |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.05m | 5.25m+202mm |
| Width | 2.03m | 2.05m+15mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.22m | Not available |
| Height | 1.96m | 1.87m-90mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.10m | 3.20m+97mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 1760L (better) | 857L* |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 2175L |
| Seats | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.9m (better) | 11.54m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,399kg | Not available |
| Towing Capacity | 2,000kg | 2,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 71kWh | 118.5kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 202 mi | 372 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 150kW | 350kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £46,050 (better) | £215,670 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | suv |
| Available | 2023+ | 2026+ |
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Inferred from the ICE Range Rover LWB (5-seat); not yet confirmed for the EV, which may differ slightly due to battery packaging.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources reporting the long-wheelbase Range Rover Electric; matches the ICE Range Rover LWB body shell.
* Land Rover Range Rover LWB: Verified from multiple independent sources; shares the ICE Range Rover LWB platform.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CustomTitanium | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 202 miles | 372 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 168 miles | 310 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 41 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 150 kW | 350 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 71 kWh | 118.5 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford E-Tourneo CustomTitanium | Land Rover Range Rover LWBSV |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 12 sec | Not available |
| Power | 160 kW | Not available |
| Torque | 415 Nm | Not available |
| Drivetrain | RWD | Not available |
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
All 1 video
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford E-Tourneo Custom Titanium
Tested 2024
Adult Occupant75%
Child Occupant86%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist53%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford E-Tourneo Custom
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Land Rover Range Rover LWB
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Land Rover Range Rover LWB worth the extra £169,620 over the Ford E-Tourneo Custom?
The Land Rover Range Rover LWB costs £169,620 more than the Ford E-Tourneo Custom. For that premium it adds 170 miles more WLTP range and 200 kW faster peak rapid charging. The Ford E-Tourneo Custom is not just cheaper - it also offers 903 litres more boot space and 4 more seats (9 versus 5). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Land Rover Range Rover LWB comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford E-Tourneo Custom or the Land Rover Range Rover LWB?
The Ford E-Tourneo Custom is £169,620 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £216 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford E-Tourneo Custom comes out roughly £169,500 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 168 miles for the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and 310 miles for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Land Rover Range Rover LWB goes roughly 142 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford E-Tourneo Custom or the Land Rover Range Rover LWB?
The two are within 15 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 368 mm of total clearance for the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and about 353 mm of total clearance for the Land Rover Range Rover LWB. The Ford E-Tourneo Custom also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford E-Tourneo Custom comparisons
More Land Rover Range Rover LWB comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among the best city EVsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among EVs with the biggest bootsWhere the Ford E-Tourneo Custom and Land Rover Range Rover LWB rank among Best Used Electric Cars Under £10,000 (UK)
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .