In this comparison, BYD ATTO 3 leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs, while the Volvo EC40 leads on family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the BYD ATTO 3 if...
Choose the Volvo EC40 if...
Our take
The BYD ATTO 3 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
EVO Design RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £38,990 (better) | £46,860 |
| Official range | 317 miles (better) | 300 miles |
| Boot space | 440 L (better) | 404 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 26 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,455 mm | 4,440 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,875 mm | 1,873 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,075 mm | 2,034 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,615 mm | 1,591 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.4 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 525 mm spare | 527 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 917 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Boot space (seats up) | 440 L (better) | 404 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1338 L (better) | 1310 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | 1,500 kg (better) |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
BYD ATTO 3
Volvo EC40
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | BYD ATTO 3 EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.44m-15mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.87m-2mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.08m | 2.03m-41mm |
| Height | 1.61m | 1.59m-24mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.72m | 2.70m-18mm |
| Ground Clearance | 180mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 440L (better) | 404L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1338L (better) | 1310L |
| Frunk | Not available | 31L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 917mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.4m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,750kg (better) | 2,065kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | 1,500kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 74.8kWh (better) | 70kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 317 mi (better) | 300 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 220kW (better) | 200kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,990 (better) | £46,860 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 317 miles (better) | 300 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 263 miles (better) | 206 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 26 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 220 kW (better) | 200 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 147 Wh/km (better) | 167 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 74.8 kWh (better) | 70 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 5.5 sec (better) | 7.3 sec |
| Power | 230 kW (better) | 175 kW |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 420 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

BYD ATTO 3
EVO Design RWD

Volvo EC40
Single Motor
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | BYD ATTO 3EVO Design RWD | Volvo EC40Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
BYD ATTO 3
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 costs £7,870 more than the BYD ATTO 3. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The BYD ATTO 3 is not just cheaper - it also offers 55 kW more power, a 1.8s quicker 0-62mph time and lower energy use, 147 versus 167 Wh/km. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the BYD ATTO 3 comes out ahead overall.
The BYD ATTO 3 is £7,870 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the BYD ATTO 3 comes out roughly £7,990 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 263 miles for the BYD ATTO 3 and 206 miles for the Volvo EC40 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The BYD ATTO 3 goes roughly 57 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the BYD ATTO 3 and 26 in the Volvo EC40, so the Volvo EC40 loses less time at each stop. So the BYD ATTO 3 stops less often while the Volvo EC40 stops for less time - pick on which you would rather do.
The two are within 2 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 527 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EC40 and about 525 mm of total clearance for the BYD ATTO 3. The BYD ATTO 3 also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the BYD ATTO 3 and 84% for the Volvo EC40. That gives the BYD ATTO 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The BYD ATTO 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Volvo EC40's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More BYD ATTO 3 comparisons
More Volvo EC40 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used BYD Atto 3 buyer’s guide: the original 60 kWh car vs the 2026 Atto 3 EVO, BYD’s long warranty, slow rapid charging, insurance, what owners report, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX40 and EC40 buyer’s guide: Single Motor, Extended Range and Twin Motor compared, real-world range, warranty left, the B-mode braking recall, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .