In this comparison, Audi Q4 e-tron leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs, while the Renault Scenic leads on value for money.
Choose the Audi Q4 e-tron if...
Choose the Renault Scenic if...
Our take
The Audi Q4 e-tron leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £46,260 | £36,995 (better) |
| Official range | 274 miles | 392 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 520 L | 545 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 37 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.9 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,588 mm | 4,470 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,865 mm | 1,864 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,108 mm | 2,085 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,632 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m (better) | 10.9 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 535 mm spare | 536 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 890 mm |
| Boot space (seats up) | 520 L | 545 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1490 L | 1670 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Audi Q4 e-tron
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Renault Scenic
| Specification | Audi Q4 e-tron e-tron 204PS | Renault Scenic Techno |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.59m | 4.47m-118mm |
| Width | 1.86m | 1.86m-1mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.11m | 2.08m-23mm |
| Height | 1.63m | 1.62m-12mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.76m | 2.79m+21mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 520L | 545L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1490L | 1670L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 890mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m (better) | 10.92m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,940kg | 1,840kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh | 89kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 274 mi | 392 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £46,260 | £36,995 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £46,260 (not eligible) | £33,245 (-£3,750) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2026+ |
* Renault Scenic: Manufacturer quotes 15-80% on a 150 kW charger.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 274 miles | 392 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 229 miles | 274 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 37 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 168 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh | 89 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 7.9 sec (better) |
| Power | 150 kW | 160 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm (better) | 300 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Audi Q4 e-tron
e-tron 204PS

Renault Scenic
Techno
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Audi Q4 e-trone-tron 204PS | Renault ScenicTechno |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Audi Q4 e-tron
Renault Scenic
The Audi Q4 e-tron costs £9,265 more than the Renault Scenic. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Renault Scenic is not just cheaper - it also offers 118 miles more WLTP range. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Audi Q4 e-tron comes out ahead overall.
The Renault Scenic is £9,265 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Renault Scenic comes out roughly £9,145 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 229 miles for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 274 miles for the Renault Scenic - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Renault Scenic goes roughly 45 miles further between charging stops.
The two are within 1 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 536 mm of total clearance for the Renault Scenic and about 535 mm of total clearance for the Audi Q4 e-tron. The Audi Q4 e-tron also turns in a 0.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Audi Q4 e-tron and 84% for the Renault Scenic. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Audi Q4 e-tron comparisons
More Renault Scenic comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Audi Q4 e-tron buyer’s guide: every version and battery explained, the 2021-2023 cars vs the 2024 update, the brake-software recall, warranty left, real-world range, what to pay, used vs new, and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Renault Scenic E-Tech electric buyer’s guide: the 2024 cars vs the 2025 update and the MY27 89 kWh car, 22 kW vs 11 kW AC charging, trims, Renault’s 5-year warranty, real-world range, what owners report, used vs new with the £3,750 grant, and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .