In this comparison, Alpine A390 leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Ford Mustang Mach-E counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Alpine A390 if...
Our take
The Alpine A390 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
GT 400ch
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £61,390 | £50,840 (better) |
| Official range | 345 miles (better) | 292 miles |
| Boot space | 532 L (better) | 402 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 25 min (better) | 32 min |
| 0-62 mph | 3.9 sec (better) | 6.7 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,615 mm | 4,713 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,885 mm (better) | 1,930 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,097 mm |
| Height | 1,532 mm | 1,624 mm |
| Turning circle | 11 m (better) | 11.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 515 mm spare (better) | 470 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 997 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 4 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 532 L (better) | 402 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1420 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 100 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Alpine A390
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
| Specification | Alpine A390 GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-E Select RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.62m | 4.71m+98mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.93m+45mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.10m |
| Height | 1.53m | 1.62m+92mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.79m | 2.98m+194mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 116mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 532L (better) | 402L |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1420L |
| Frunk | Not available | 100L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 997mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11m (better) | 11.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,163kg (better) | 2,166kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 89kWh (better) | 72.6kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 345 mi (better) | 292 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 190kW (better) | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £61,390 | £50,840 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2024+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 345 miles (better) | 292 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 288 miles (better) | 210 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 25 min (better) | 32 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 190 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 179 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 89 kWh (better) | 72.6 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 3.9 sec (better) | 6.7 sec |
| Power | 294 kW (better) | 197 kW |
| Torque | 650 Nm (better) | 525 Nm |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Alpine A390
GT 400ch

Ford Mustang Mach-E
Select RWD
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2021
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Alpine A390GT 400ch | Ford Mustang Mach-ESelect RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Alpine A390
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Alpine A390
No active listings.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Alpine A390 costs £10,550 more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. For that premium it adds 53 miles more WLTP range, 40 kW faster peak rapid charging and 130 litres more boot space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Alpine A390 comes out ahead overall.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is £10,550 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £176 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Mustang Mach-E comes out roughly £10,470 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 288 miles for the Alpine A390 and 210 miles for the Ford Mustang Mach-E - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Alpine A390 goes roughly 78 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 25-32 minutes.
The Alpine A390 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 45 mm narrower than the Ford Mustang Mach-E. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 515 mm of total clearance for the Alpine A390 and about 470 mm of total clearance for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The Alpine A390 also turns in a 0.6 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Alpine A390 and 90% for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That gives the Ford Mustang Mach-E a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Ford Mustang Mach-E's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Alpine A390's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Alpine A390 comparisons
More Ford Mustang Mach-E comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .