In this comparison, Alpine A290 leads on value for money, family practicality and charging speed, while the BMW i3 leads on running costs and city driving.
Choose the Alpine A290 if...
Choose the BMW i3 (60Ah) if...
Our take
The Alpine A290 leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
GT +
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £33,995 | £32,350 (better) |
| Official range | 234 miles (better) | 118 miles |
| Boot space | 326 L (better) | 260 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 7.4 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3,997 mm | 4,006 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,823 mm | 1,775 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm | 1,999 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,512 mm | 1,598 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.2 m | 9.9 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 577 mm spare | 625 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 (better) | 4 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 326 L (better) | 260 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1106 L (better) | 1100 L |
| Specification | Alpine A290 GT + | BMW i3 60Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.00m | 4.01m+9mm |
| Width | 1.82m | 1.77m-48mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.00m-21mm |
| Height | 1.51m | 1.60m+86mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.53m | 2.57m+36mm |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 160mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 326L (better) | 260L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1106L (better) | 1100L |
| Seats | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.2m | 9.9m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,483kg | 1,270kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 52kWh (better) | 21.6kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 234 mi (better) | 118 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW (better) | 50kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £33,995 | £32,350 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £30,245 (-£3,750) | £32,350 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Available | 2025+ | 2013–2017 |
* BMW i3: NEDC figure — WLTP testing was not available for this model year
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 234 miles (better) | 118 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 155 miles (better) | 75 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW (better) | 50 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.4 kW |
| Energy consumption | 165 Wh/km | 129 Wh/km (better) |
| Usable battery capacity | 52 kWh (better) | 18.8 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.4 sec | 7.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 130 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| Torque | 285 Nm (better) | 250 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Alpine A290
GT +

BMW i3
60Ah
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2013
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Alpine A290GT + | BMW i360Ah |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,934 km |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Alpine A290
GT +

BMW i3
60Ah
Get a quote
Alpine A290
BMW i3
The Alpine A290 costs £1,645 more than the BMW i3. For that premium it adds 116 miles more WLTP range, 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 66 litres more boot space. The BMW i3 is not just cheaper - it also offers lower energy use, 129 versus 165 Wh/km. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Alpine A290 comes out ahead overall.
The BMW i3 is £1,645 cheaper to buy. The BMW i3 is cheaper to charge, roughly £144 a year versus £184 for the Alpine A290, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the BMW i3 comes out roughly £1,845 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 155 miles for the Alpine A290 and 75 miles for the BMW i3 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Alpine A290 goes roughly 80 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-30 minutes.
The BMW i3 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 48 mm narrower than the Alpine A290. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 625 mm of total clearance for the BMW i3 and about 577 mm of total clearance for the Alpine A290.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Alpine A290 and 87% for the BMW i3. That gives the BMW i3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Alpine A290 comparisons
More BMW i3 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .