In this comparison, Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed, while the Volvo EX30 counters with the lowest price.
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
SE L 60
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £39,010 | £33,060 (better) |
| Official range | 269 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| Boot space | 585 L (better) | 400 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min (better) | 26 min |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 9.1 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,658 mm | 4,233 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,879 mm | 1,838 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,148 mm | 2,032 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,622 mm | 1,550 mm |
| Turning circle | 9.3 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 521 mm spare | 562 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 821 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 585 L (better) | 400 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1710 L (better) | 1000 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 7 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg | 1,000 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX30
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
| Specification | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 | Volvo EX30 Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.66m | 4.23m-425mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.84m-41mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.15m | 2.03m-116mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.55m-72mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | 2.65m-116mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 585L (better) | 400L |
| Boot (seats down) | 1710L (better) | 1000L |
| Frunk | Not available | 7L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 821mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 9.3m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,084kg | 1,840kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 51kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 269 mi (better) | 209 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 165kW (better) | 150kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £39,010 | £33,060 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £37,510 (-£1,500) | £33,060 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2024+ |
* Volvo EX30: 11 kW AC on Core and Plus; Ultra has a 22 kW on-board charger.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 269 miles (better) | 209 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 224 miles (better) | 149 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min (better) | 26 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 165 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 169 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh (better) | 51 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 9.1 sec |
| Power | 150 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 343 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews

Volvo EX30
Single Motor
7.5/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Volvo EX30Single Motor |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.
Shared watch-outs for both cars
Owners of every car here flag real-world range. Worth checking on a test drive whichever you choose.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60

Volvo EX30
Single Motor
Get a quote
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX30
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
Volvo EX30
The Skoda Enyaq costs £5,950 more than the Volvo EX30. For that premium it adds 60 miles more WLTP range, 185 litres more boot space and a 1.0s quicker 0-62mph time. The Volvo EX30 is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Volvo EX30 is £5,950 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £160 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Volvo EX30 comes out roughly £5,830 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq and 149 miles for the Volvo EX30 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 76 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-26 minutes.
The Volvo EX30 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 41 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 562 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX30 and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.7 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Skoda Enyaq and 90% for the Volvo EX30. That gives the Volvo EX30 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Volvo EX30's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
More Volvo EX30 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .