In this comparison, Skoda Enyaq leads on family practicality, charging speed and city driving, while the Tesla Model 3 leads on running costs.
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
Choose the Tesla Model 3 if...
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
RWD
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £39,010 | £37,990 (better) |
| Official range | 269 miles | 332 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 585 L | 682 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min | Not available |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.2 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,658 mm | 4,721 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,879 mm (better) | 1,933 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,148 mm | 2,088 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,622 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Turning circle | 9.3 m (better) | 11.6 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 521 mm spare (better) | 467 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 585 L | 682 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1710 L | Not available |
| Frunk | 0 L | Not available |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 1,000 kg (better) | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3
| Specification | Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 | Tesla Model 3 RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.66m | 4.72m+63mm |
| Width | 1.88m | 1.93m+54mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.15m | 2.09m-60mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.44m-182mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.77m | Not available |
| Ground Clearance | Not available | 137mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 585L | 682L* (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1710L | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 9.3m (better) | 11.6m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,084kg | 1,772kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | 1,000kg (better) | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 63kWh (better) | 60kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 269 mi | 332 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 165kW | 175kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £39,010 | £37,990 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £37,510 (-£1,500) | £37,990 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Saloon |
| Available | 2025+ | 2024+ |
* Tesla Model 3: Tesla publishes 682 L as total cargo volume (boot + frunk, measured to roof) — not directly comparable to standard VDA figures used by other brands.
* Tesla Model 3: Not published by Tesla; verified from multiple independent sources.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 269 miles | 332 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 224 miles | 229 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min | Not available |
| Max rapid charge rate | 165 kW | 175 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | Not available |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 130 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 59 kWh (better) | 57.5 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec | 6.2 sec (better) |
| Power | 150 kW | 208 kW (better) |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 340 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews

Tesla Model 3
RWD
8.5/10
average across 6 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 | Tesla Model 3RWD |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,934 km (better) |
Aggregated from UK owner forums and communities - the things you only learn after living with the car.

Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60

Tesla Model 3
RWD
Get a quote
Skoda Enyaq
Tesla Model 3
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
Tesla Model 3
The Skoda Enyaq costs £1,020 more than the Tesla Model 3. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. The Tesla Model 3 is not just cheaper - it also offers 63 miles more WLTP range, 97 litres more boot space and 58 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
The Tesla Model 3 is £1,020 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £144 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Tesla Model 3 comes out roughly £1,100 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq and 229 miles for the Tesla Model 3 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV.
The Skoda Enyaq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 54 mm narrower than the Tesla Model 3. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 467 mm of total clearance for the Tesla Model 3. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Skoda Enyaq and 92% for the Tesla Model 3. That gives the Tesla Model 3 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Tesla Model 3's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
More Tesla Model 3 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .