Loading comparison
Peugeot e-Traveller vs Skoda Peaq
At a glance
In this comparison, Peugeot e-Traveller counters with the lowest price, while the Skoda Peaq leads on value for money, motorway range and family practicality.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Skoda Peaq if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.9p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Peaq wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
ValueSkoda
Peugeot
5.3
Skoda
6
Motorway RangeSkoda
Peugeot
1.2
Skoda
8.2
FamilySkoda
Peugeot
4.6
Skoda
9.5
ChargingSkoda
Peugeot
3.8
Skoda
6.5
Cost Per MileSkoda
Peugeot
0.2
Skoda
7.3
City DrivingSkoda
Peugeot
1.6
Skoda
3.1
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Skoda Peaq
SE L 90
- 187 miles more WLTP range
- 99 kW faster rapid charging
- 110 kW more power
- 7.2s quicker 0-62 mph
- 1.0 m tighter turning circle
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-TravellerCombi | Skoda PeaqSE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £37,060 (better) | £51,980 |
| Official range | 215 miles | 402 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 1700 L (better) | 890 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | Not available | 28 min |
| 0-62 mph | 14.3 sec | 7.1 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Peugeot e-Traveller
Skoda Peaq
Length
Peugeot e-Traveller4,981mm
Skoda Peaq4,870mm-111mm
Width
Peugeot e-Traveller1,920mm
Skoda Peaq1,867mm-53mm
Height
Peugeot e-Traveller1,890mm
Skoda Peaq1,664mm-226mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Peugeot e-TravellerCombi | Skoda PeaqSE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,981 mm | 4,870 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,920 mm | 1,867 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,204 mm | 1,984 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,890 mm | 1,664 mm |
| Turning circle | 12.4 m | 11.4 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 480 mm spare | 533 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Peugeot e-TravellerCombi | Skoda PeaqSE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 1700 L (better) | 890 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 3100 L (better) | 2075 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 37 L (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Peugeot e-Traveller
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Peaq
- 1st-largest boot among SUVs in our catalogue at 890 L.
- 402 mile WLTP range, longer than 95% of SUVs we track.
- At 4,870 mm, longer than 85% of SUVs we track.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Peugeot e-Traveller Combi |  Skoda Peaq SE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.98m | 4.87m-111mm |
| Width | 1.92m | 1.87m-53mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.20m | 1.98m-220mm |
| Height | 1.89m | 1.66m-226mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.27m | 2.96m-310mm |
| Ground Clearance | 150mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 1700L (better) | 890L |
| Boot (seats down) | 3100L (better) | 2075L |
| Frunk | Not available | 37L (better) |
| Seats | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 12.4m | 11.4m (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 75kWh | 91kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 215 mi | 402 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 199kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £37,060 (better) | £51,980 |
| Price after EV grant | £35,560 (-£1,500) | £51,980 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Available | 2022+ | 2027+ |
* Peugeot e-Traveller: Euro NCAP tested the platform under the 2015 protocol but the result page has since been retired. No current published rating.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Peugeot e-TravellerCombi | Skoda PeaqSE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 215 miles | 402 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 160 miles | 335 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | Not available | 28 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 199 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 230 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 75 kWh | 86 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Peugeot e-TravellerCombi | Skoda PeaqSE L 90 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 14.3 sec | 7.1 sec (better) |
| Power | 100 kW | 210 kW (better) |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 545 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Peugeot e-Traveller
Combi
Skoda Peaq
SE L 90
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Peugeot e-Traveller
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Peugeot e-Traveller Combi
Peugeot e-Traveller Combi
Euro NCAP tested the platform under the 2015 protocol but the result page has since been retired. No current published rating.
Buying options
Get a quote
Peugeot e-Traveller
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Peaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Is the Skoda Peaq worth the extra £14,920 over the Peugeot e-Traveller?
The Skoda Peaq costs £14,920 more than the Peugeot e-Traveller. For that premium it adds 187 miles more WLTP range, 99 kW faster peak rapid charging and 110 kW more power. The Peugeot e-Traveller is not just cheaper - it also offers 810 litres more boot space and 2 more seats (9 versus 7). On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Peaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Peugeot e-Traveller or the Skoda Peaq?
The Peugeot e-Traveller is £14,920 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Peaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £152 a year versus £248 for the Peugeot e-Traveller, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Peugeot e-Traveller comes out roughly £14,440 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 160 miles for the Peugeot e-Traveller and 335 miles for the Skoda Peaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Peaq goes roughly 175 miles further between charging stops.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Peugeot e-Traveller or the Skoda Peaq?
The Skoda Peaq is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 53 mm narrower than the Peugeot e-Traveller. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 533 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Peaq and about 480 mm of total clearance for the Peugeot e-Traveller. The Skoda Peaq also turns in a 1.0 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Peugeot e-Traveller comparisons
More Skoda Peaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among the best 7-seater EVsWhere the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Peugeot e-Traveller and Skoda Peaq rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .