In this comparison, MINI Aceman leads on motorway range, running costs and city driving, while the Smart #1 leads on family practicality.
Choose the MINI Aceman if...
Choose the Smart #1 if...
Our take
The MINI Aceman leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £28,310 (better) | £29,960 |
| Official range | 191 miles | 193 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 300 L | 313 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 29 min (better) | 30 min |
| 0-62 mph | 12.7 sec | Not available |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,079 mm | 4,270 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,754 mm (better) | 1,822 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,984 mm (better) | 2,025 mm |
| Height | 1,514 mm | 1,636 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.8 m (better) | 11 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 646 mm spare (better) | 578 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear legroom | 822 mm | Not available |
| Boot space (seats up) | 300 L | 313 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1005 L (better) | 976 L |
| Frunk | 0 L | 15 L (better) |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg (better) | 0 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
MINI Aceman
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Smart #1
| Specification | MINI Aceman E | Smart #1 Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.08m | 4.27m+191mm |
| Width | 1.75m | 1.82m+68mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.98m | 2.02m+41mm |
| Height | 1.51m | 1.64m+122mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.61m | 2.75m+144mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 300L | 313L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1005L (better) | 976L |
| Frunk | Not available | 15L (better) |
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Rear Legroom | 822mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.8m (better) | 11m |
| Kerb Weight | 1,720kg | Not available |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg (better) | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 38.5kWh | 49kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 191 mi | 193 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 75kW | 130kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £28,310 (better) | £29,960 |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024+ | 2023+ |
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 191 miles | 193 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 159 miles (better) | 133 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 29 min (better) | 30 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 75 kW | 130 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW (better) | 7.4 kW |
| Energy consumption | Not available | 181 Wh/km |
| Usable battery capacity | 38.5 kWh | 49 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | LFP |
| Battery architecture | 400V | Not available |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 12.7 sec | Not available |
| Power | 135 kW | 200 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | Not available |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.

MINI Aceman
E

Smart #1
Pure
7.5/10
average across 4 reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2025
Tested 2022
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | MINI AcemanE | Smart #1Pure |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 201,168 km |
Get a quote
MINI Aceman
Smart #1
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
MINI Aceman
No active listings.
Smart #1
The Smart #1 costs £1,650 more than the MINI Aceman. For that premium it adds 55 kW faster peak rapid charging and 65 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the MINI Aceman comes out ahead overall.
The MINI Aceman is £1,650 cheaper to buy. The MINI Aceman is cheaper to charge, roughly £136 a year versus £200 for the Smart #1, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the MINI Aceman comes out roughly £1,970 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 159 miles for the MINI Aceman and 133 miles for the Smart #1 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The MINI Aceman goes roughly 26 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 29-30 minutes.
The MINI Aceman is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 68 mm narrower than the Smart #1. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 646 mm of total clearance for the MINI Aceman and about 578 mm of total clearance for the Smart #1.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the MINI Aceman and 90% for the Smart #1. That gives the Smart #1 a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Smart #1's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the MINI Aceman's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More MINI Aceman comparisons
More Smart #1 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .