In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV stays competitive across the board, while the Volvo EX90 leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Choose the Volvo EX90 (2024-2025) if...
Our take
The Volvo EX90 wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Too close to call
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Twin Motor 111kWh
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £129,170 | £96,255 (better) |
| Official range | 366 miles | 374 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 565 L (better) | 324 L |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 6.1 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5,125 mm | 5,037 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,959 mm (better) | 1,964 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,157 mm | 2,113 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,718 mm | 1,744 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.9 m (better) | 12 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 441 mm spare (better) | 436 mm spare |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Rear legroom | Not available | 926 mm |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 565 L (better) | 324 L |
| Boot space (seats down) | 2020 L | 2082 L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 2,200 kg |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Volvo EX90
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 5.13m | 5.04m-88mm |
| Width | 1.96m | 1.96m+5mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.16m | 2.11m-44mm |
| Height | 1.72m | 1.74m+26mm |
| Wheelbase | 3.03m | 2.98m-45mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 565L (better) | 324L |
| Boot (seats down) | 2020L | 2082L (better) |
| Frunk | Not available | 46L |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Rear Legroom | Not available | 926mm |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.9m (better) | 12m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,805kg | 2,725kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 2,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 120kWh (better) | 111kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 366 mi | 374 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 200kW | 250kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £129,170 | £96,255 (better) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2023+ | 2024–2025 |
* Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 366 miles | 374 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 305 miles | 312 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 32 min | 22 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 200 kW | 250 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 22 kW (better) | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 108.4 kWh (better) | 107 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 800V (better) |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 6.1 sec | 5.5 sec (better) |
| Power | 265 kW | 300 kW (better) |
| Torque | 800 Nm (better) | 670 Nm |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
450 4MATIC

Volvo EX90
Twin Motor 111kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 450 4MATIC
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-05. Limited-production / halo / pre-launch / new-brand models are typically rated some time after general sale.
Tested 2025
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV450 4MATIC | Volvo EX90Twin Motor 111kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 10 years (better) | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 250,000 km (better) | 160,934 km |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Volvo EX90
The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV costs £32,915 more than the Volvo EX90. For that premium it adds 241 litres more boot space. The Volvo EX90 is not just cheaper - it also offers 50 kW faster peak rapid charging and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Volvo EX90 comes out ahead overall.
The Volvo EX90 is £32,915 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £200 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Volvo EX90 comes out roughly £33,035 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 305 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 312 miles for the Volvo EX90 - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 32 minutes in the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 22 in the Volvo EX90, so the Volvo EX90 loses less time at each stop.
The two are within 5 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 441 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and about 436 mm of total clearance for the Volvo EX90.
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 84% for the Volvo EX90. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. The Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV has the longer battery warranty at 10 years, versus 8 for the Volvo EX90.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV comparisons
More Volvo EX90 comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
GuideA used Mercedes EQS buyer’s guide: the 450+ and AMG EQS 53 saloons and the EQS SUV, the 2024 battery update, software recalls, the 10-year battery warranty, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
GuideA used Volvo EX90 buyer’s guide: the 400-volt 2024-2025 car vs the 800-volt 2026 upgrade, the free core computer swap, recalls, real-world range, what to pay and a printable checklist.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .