In this comparison, Mercedes-Benz EQA leads on value for money and family practicality, while the VW ID.3 Neo leads on motorway range, charging speed and running costs.
Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQA if...
Choose the VW ID.3 Neo if...
Our take
The VW ID.3 Neo leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £43,495 | £33,080 (better) |
| Official range | 263 miles (better) | 258 miles |
| Boot space | 340 L | 385 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
Size Comparison
Length
Width
Height
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,463 mm | 4,287 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,834 mm | 1,809 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | 2,020 mm | 2,015 mm (better) |
| Height | 1,620 mm | 1,554 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.4 m | 10.2 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 566 mm spare | 591 mm spare (better) |
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 340 L | 385 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1320 L (better) | 1267 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 750 kg | Not available |
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
VW ID.3 Neo
| Specification | Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | VW ID.3 Neo Life 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.46m | 4.29m-176mm |
| Width | 1.83m | 1.81m-25mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 2.02m | 2.02m-5mm |
| Height | 1.62m | 1.55m-66mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.73m | 2.76m+35mm |
| Ground Clearance | 168mm | 150mm-18mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 340L | 385L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1320L (better) | 1267L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.4m | 10.2m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,040kg | Not available |
| Towing Capacity | 750kg | Not available |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 66.5kWh (better) | 50kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 263 mi (better) | 258 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 100kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £43,495 | £33,080 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £43,495 (not eligible) | £31,580 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Available | 2021–2022 | 2026+ |
* VW ID.3 Neo: Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-09. The 2025 five-star rating was for the ID.3 it replaces.
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 263 miles (better) | 258 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 219 miles (better) | 215 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 30 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 100 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 66.5 kWh (better) | 50 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Standard (better) | Not standard |
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8.1 sec (better) | 8.6 sec |
| Power | 140 kW (better) | 125 kW |
| Torque | 375 Nm | Not available |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.

Mercedes-Benz EQA
250

VW ID.3 Neo
Life 50 kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Tested 2019
VW ID.3 Neo Life 50 kWh
Not yet Euro NCAP tested as of 2026-09. The 2025 five-star rating was for the ID.3 it replaces.
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mercedes-Benz EQA250 | VW ID.3 NeoLife 50 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,000 km | 160,000 km |
Get a quote
Mercedes-Benz EQA
VW ID.3 Neo
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Mercedes-Benz EQA
VW ID.3 Neo
No active listings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA costs £10,415 more than the VW ID.3 Neo. On the headline specs that premium buys little measurable advantage - the two are closely matched on range, charging and space. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the VW ID.3 Neo comes out ahead overall.
The VW ID.3 Neo is £10,415 cheaper to buy. The VW ID.3 Neo is cheaper to charge, roughly £128 a year versus £176 for the Mercedes-Benz EQA, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the VW ID.3 Neo comes out roughly £10,655 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 219 miles for the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 215 miles for the VW ID.3 Neo - effectively matched, and both well below their WLTP figures because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-30 minutes.
The two are within 25 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 591 mm of total clearance for the VW ID.3 Neo and about 566 mm of total clearance for the Mercedes-Benz EQA. The VW ID.3 Neo also turns in a 1.2 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mercedes-Benz EQA comparisons
More VW ID.3 Neo comparisons
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .