Loading comparison
Mazda 6e vs Skoda Enyaq
Selected trimTakumiChange trim348 mi · 78 kWh · £38,995
At a glance
In this comparison, Mazda 6e leads on value for money, motorway range and running costs, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on family practicality, charging speed and city driving.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Mazda 6e if...
- you want the most for your money - best overall spec per pound
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.9p per mile on off-peak electricity
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
ValueMazda
Mazda
6.8
Skoda
6.3
Motorway RangeMazda
Mazda
6.2
Skoda
5.3
FamilySkoda
Mazda
6.5
Skoda
8
ChargingSkoda
Mazda
5
Skoda
6.3
Cost Per MileMazda
Mazda
7.5
Skoda
6.5
City DrivingSkoda
Mazda
2.9
Skoda
5.9
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £38,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 348 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Boot space | 336 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 24 min | 24 min |
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Mazda 6e
Skoda Enyaq
Length
Mazda 6e4,921mm
Skoda Enyaq4,658mm-263mm
Width
Mazda 6e1,890mm
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm-11mm
Height
Mazda 6e1,491mm-131mm
Skoda Enyaq1,622mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,921 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,890 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,491 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 11.6 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 510 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 336 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | 72 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,000 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Mazda 6e
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Mazda 6e Takumi |  Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.92m | 4.66m-263mm |
| Width | 1.89m | 1.88m-11mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.49m | 1.62m+131mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.90m | 2.77m-129mm |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 336L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Frunk | 72L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 11.6m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 2,027kg (better) | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 78kWh (better) | 63kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 348 mi (better) | 269 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 195kW (better) | 165kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £38,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £38,995 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | Saloon | SUV |
| Available | 2026+ | 2025+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 348 miles (better) | 269 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 290 miles (better) | 224 miles |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 24 min | 24 min |
| Max rapid charge rate | 195 kW (better) | 165 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 78 kWh (better) | 59 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | LFP | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 800V (better) | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 7.9 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 190 kW (better) | 150 kW |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests.
Mazda 6e
Takumi
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
- DrivingElectric4.5/5
- Auto Express4.5/5
- Parkers4.3/5
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Mazda 6e
All 3 videos
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Mazda 6e Takumi
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant93%
Child Occupant93%
Vulnerable Road Users74%
Safety Assist77%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq SE L 60
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant90%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist78%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Mazda 6eTakumi | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Mazda 6e
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Mazda 6e or the Skoda Enyaq?
The Mazda 6e is £15 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the two land within £55 of each other - effectively the same to own. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 290 miles for the Mazda 6e and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mazda 6e goes roughly 66 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-24 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Mazda 6e or the Skoda Enyaq?
The two are within 11 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 510 mm of total clearance for the Mazda 6e. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 2.3 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Mazda 6e or the Skoda Enyaq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Mazda 6e and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That gives the Mazda 6e a modest edge in retained real-world range. The Mazda 6e's LFP-type pack tolerates daily 100% charging, while the Skoda Enyaq's NMC-type pack lasts longest kept to about 80% for everyday use.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Mazda 6e comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among the cheapest EVs to runWhere the Mazda 6e and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs with the biggest boots
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .