Mazda 6e vs Omoda E5

The Mazda 6e costs £5,930 more than the Omoda E5. For that premium it adds 81 miles more WLTP range, 65 kW faster peak rapid charging and 35 kW more power. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Mazda 6e comes out ahead overall.

The Omoda E5 is £5,930 cheaper to buy. Running costs are almost identical - about £152 a year either way, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Omoda E5 comes out roughly £5,810 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.

EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 290 miles for the Mazda 6e and 194 miles for the Omoda E5 - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Mazda 6e goes roughly 96 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-28 minutes.

The Omoda E5 is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 60 mm narrower than the Mazda 6e. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 570 mm of total clearance for the Omoda E5 and about 510 mm of total clearance for the Mazda 6e. The Omoda E5 also turns in a 0.8 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.

Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 90% battery health for the Mazda 6e and 90% for the Omoda E5. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use LFP-type cells, which are happy charged to 100% every day.