Loading comparison
Jeep Compass vs Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024)
Selected trimAltitudeChange trim285 mi · 74 kWh · £36,999
At a glance
In this comparison, Jeep Compass stays competitive across the board, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Skoda Enyaq (2021-2024) if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 2.1p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you drive in the city - it's compact with an excellent turning circle
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq wins almost every category - it's the clear choice unless price is the deciding factor.
Value
Jeep
6.6
Skoda
6.5
Too close to call
Motorway RangeSkoda
Jeep
2.2
Skoda
4.9
FamilySkoda
Jeep
7.1
Skoda
8.1
ChargingSkoda
Jeep
4.3
Skoda
4.8
Cost Per MileSkoda
Jeep
1.3
Skoda
4.9
City DrivingSkoda
Jeep
4.1
Skoda
6.2
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £36,999 | £33,450 (better) |
| Official range | 285 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Boot space | 550 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 35 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 8.7 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Jeep Compass
Skoda Enyaq
Length
Jeep Compass4,550mm-99mm
Skoda Enyaq4,649mm
Width
Jeep Compass1,900mm
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm-21mm
Height
Jeep Compass1,700mm
Skoda Enyaq1,620mm-80mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,550 mm | 4,649 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,900 mm | 1,879 mm (better) |
| Width with mirrors out | Not available | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,700 mm | 1,620 mm |
| Turning circle | Not available | 9.3 m |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 500 mm spare | 521 mm spare (better) |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | 2 | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 550 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | Not available | 1710 L |
| Frunk | Not available | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | Not available | 1,200 kg |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Jeep Compass
Not enough peers to make confident percentile claims.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Jeep Compass Altitude |  Skoda Enyaq iV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.55m | 4.65m+99mm |
| Width | 1.90m | 1.88m-21mm |
| Width (mirrors) | Not available | 2.15m |
| Height | 1.70m | 1.62m-80mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.80m | 2.77m-35mm |
| Ground Clearance | 200mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 550L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | Not available | 1710L |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | Not available | 9.3m |
| Kerb Weight | 2,115kg | 1,924kg (better) |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,200kg |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 74kWh (better) | 62kWh |
| Range (WLTP) | 285 mi (better) | 249 mi |
| Max DC Charge | 160kW (better) | 120kW |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £36,999 | £33,450 (better) |
| Price after EV grant | £35,499 (-£1,500) | £33,450 (not eligible) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2025+ | 2021–2024 |
* Skoda Enyaq: Rapid charging depends on the build: early 2021 cars had 50 kW as standard with 100 kW (60) or 125 kW (80) optional; later cars 120 kW (60), 135 kW (80, 85) or 175 kW (2024 85x and vRS). Many adverts state it, e.g. "DC135kW".
* Skoda Enyaq: Latest WLTP figure for this version; earlier builds were rated slightly lower.
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 285 miles (better) | 249 miles |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 193 miles | 208 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 35 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 160 kW (better) | 120 kW |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Energy consumption | 189 Wh/km | Not available |
| Usable battery capacity | 74 kWh (better) | 58 kWh |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | Not available |
| Battery architecture | Not available | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not standard | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | Not available | 8.7 sec |
| Power | 155 kW (better) | 132 kW |
| Torque | 345 Nm (better) | 310 Nm |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Jeep Compass
Altitude
Skoda Enyaq
iV 60
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Jeep Compass Altitude
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant80%
Child Occupant85%
Vulnerable Road Users74%
Safety Assist66%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq iV 60
Tested 2021
Adult Occupant94%
Child Occupant89%
Vulnerable Road Users71%
Safety Assist82%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Jeep CompassAltitude | Skoda EnyaqiV 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | Not available | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | Not available | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Jeep Compass
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Jeep Compass
No active listings.
Skoda Enyaq
- £18,8072023Car360View
- £19,6702023Anchor CarsView
- £14,9952021Drive GreenView
Frequently asked questions
Is the Jeep Compass worth the extra £3,549 over the Skoda Enyaq?
The Jeep Compass costs £3,549 more than the Skoda Enyaq. For that premium it adds 36 miles more WLTP range and 40 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Jeep Compass or the Skoda Enyaq?
The Skoda Enyaq is £3,549 cheaper to buy. The Skoda Enyaq is cheaper to charge, roughly £168 a year versus £208 for the Jeep Compass, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Skoda Enyaq comes out roughly £3,749 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 193 miles for the Jeep Compass and 208 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 15 miles further between charging stops. A rapid charge to 80% takes around 35 minutes in the Jeep Compass and 24 in the Skoda Enyaq, so the Skoda Enyaq loses less time at each stop. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the stronger long-distance car.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Jeep Compass or the Skoda Enyaq?
The two are within 21 mm on width, so neither is meaningfully easier to thread into a tight space. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq and about 500 mm of total clearance for the Jeep Compass.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Jeep Compass comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Jeep Compass and Skoda Enyaq rank among the cheapest EVs to run
If neither is quite right
Explore other verified electric cars that may better suit the priorities this pair does not meet.
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .