Loading comparison
Ford Puma Gen-E (2024-2026) vs Skoda Enyaq
Selected trimSelect 43kWh · 2024-26Change trim234 mi · 43 kWh · £29,995
At a glance
In this comparison, Ford Puma Gen-E leads on running costs and city driving, while the Skoda Enyaq leads on motorway range, family practicality and charging speed.
Which should you choose?
Choose the Ford Puma Gen-E (2024-2026) if...
- you want the lowest running costs - from just 1.6p per mile on off-peak electricity
- you need the best car for city driving and tight parking
Choose the Skoda Enyaq if...
- you do long motorway journeys - it has the best estimated real-world range at speed
- you have a family - it has the best combination of boot space, safety, and rear legroom
- you need the fastest charging of these options
How we reached the recommendation
Verdict
Our take
The Skoda Enyaq leads in the most categories, but each car here has its strengths.
Value
Ford
6
Skoda
6.3
Too close to call
Motorway RangeSkoda
Ford
4.7
Skoda
5.3
FamilySkoda
Ford
6.2
Skoda
8
ChargingSkoda
Ford
4.1
Skoda
6.3
Cost Per MileFord
Ford
9.7
Skoda
6.5
City DrivingFord
Ford
7.6
Skoda
5.9
What each car does better
See the specification differences behind the verdict, with supporting figures for each advantage.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
- 35 miles more WLTP range
- 65 kW faster rapid charging
- 1.2 m tighter turning circle
- 1000 kg more towing capacity
Key specifications
Compare the key specifications for your selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £29,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Official range | 234 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Boot space | 566 L | 585 L (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge | 26 min | 24 min (better) |
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
Size Comparison
View:
Align by:
Ford Puma Gen-E
Skoda Enyaq
Length
Ford Puma Gen-E4,313mm-345mm
Skoda Enyaq4,658mm
Width
Ford Puma Gen-E1,805mm-74mm
Skoda Enyaq1,879mm
Height
Ford Puma Gen-E1,555mm-67mm
Skoda Enyaq1,622mm
Space, size & parking
Parking & manoeuvring
Compare exterior dimensions to assess how each car fits UK parking spaces.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4,313 mm | 4,658 mm |
| Width (mirrors folded) | 1,805 mm (better) | 1,879 mm |
| Width with mirrors out | 1,930 mm (better) | 2,148 mm |
| Height | 1,555 mm | 1,622 mm |
| Turning circle | 10.5 m | 9.3 m (better) |
| Clearance in a standard bayA standard UK parking bay is 2,400 mm wide. | 595 mm spare (better) | 521 mm spare |
People & luggage
Compare seating, child-seat mounting points, boot space and towing capacity.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear legroom | 786 mm | Not available |
| ISOFIX child-seat points | Not available | 2 |
| Boot space (seats up) | 566 L | 585 L (better) |
| Boot space (seats down) | 1283 L | 1710 L (better) |
| Frunk | 43 L (better) | 0 L |
| Towing capacity (braked) | 0 kg | 1,000 kg (better) |
How each stacks up
Percentile ranks against UK EVs of the same body style.
Ford Puma Gen-E
- Boot space of 566 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- At 4,313 mm, shorter than 80% of SUVs in our UK catalogue.
- 10.5 m turning circle, tighter than 80% of SUVs in our database.
Skoda Enyaq
- Boot space of 585 L is bigger than 85% of SUVs we track.
- 9.3 m turning circle, tighter than 100% of SUVs in our database.
Full specifications
| Specification |  Ford Puma Gen-E Select 43kWh |  Skoda Enyaq SE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 4.31m | 4.66m+345mm |
| Width | 1.80m | 1.88m+74mm |
| Width (mirrors) | 1.93m | 2.15m+218mm |
| Height | 1.55m | 1.62m+67mm |
| Wheelbase | 2.59m | 2.77m+178mm |
| Ground Clearance | 157mm | Not available |
| Capacity | ||
| Boot (seats up) | 566L | 585L (better) |
| Boot (seats down) | 1283L | 1710L (better) |
| Frunk | 43L (better) | Not available |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Rear Legroom | 786mm | Not available |
| Practicality | ||
| Turning Circle | 10.5m | 9.3m (better) |
| Kerb Weight | 1,563kg (better) | 2,084kg |
| Towing Capacity | Not available | 1,000kg (better) |
| Electric | ||
| Battery | 43kWh | 63kWh (better) |
| Range (WLTP) | 234 mi | 269 mi (better) |
| Max DC Charge | 100kW | 165kW (better) |
| Pricing | ||
| UK MSRP | £29,995 (better) | £39,010 |
| Price after EV grant | £29,995 (not eligible) | £37,510 (-£1,500) |
| Details | ||
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Available | 2024–2026 | 2025+ |
Range & charging
Range, charging & battery
Check official and estimated driving range alongside charging speeds, efficiency and battery technology.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Official range (WLTP) | 234 miles | 269 miles (better) |
| Estimated motorway rangeEVcarsguide estimate at sustained motorway speed. | 194 miles | 224 miles (better) |
| 10-80% rapid charge time | 26 min | 24 min (better) |
| Max rapid charge rate | 100 kW | 165 kW (better) |
| Home AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW |
| Usable battery capacity | 43 kWh | 59 kWh (better) |
| Battery chemistry | NMC | NMC |
| Battery architecture | 400V | 400V |
| Heat pump | Not available | Not standard |
Driving & everyday use
Performance & drivetrain
Compare acceleration, power and drivetrain specifications for the selected trims.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| 0-62 mph | 8 sec (better) | 8.1 sec |
| Power | 124 kW | 150 kW (better) |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 310 Nm (better) |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD |
What the critics say
See how UK motoring publications rate each car in their road tests. One car has more review coverage than the other - we show that rather than guessing.
Ford Puma Gen-E
Select 43kWh
No critic reviews gathered yet for this car.
Skoda Enyaq
SE L 60
8.4/10
average across 6 reviews
- Auto Express4.5/5
- DrivingElectric4.5/5
- Parkers4.3/5
Watch the reviews
Watch selected video reviews here, or visit each model page for the full collection.
Reviews and videos discuss each model overall; the specifications above apply to your selected trims.
Prices & deals
Calculate your real costs
For a useful running-cost comparison, factor in your mileage, charging access and current petrol or diesel car alongside the EV estimate.
Compare with petrol or diesel
Compare purchase price, energy, road tax and maintenance with a petrol or diesel alternative.
Calculate company-car tax
Work out monthly Benefit-in-Kind using current and future HMRC rates.
Cost per mile
Compare EV charging costs per mile with petrol and diesel using your charging options.
Check a lease quote
Assess the effective monthly cost alongside the list price and expected depreciation.
Safety & ownership confidence
Euro NCAP - Ford Puma Gen-E Select 43kWh
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant75%
Child Occupant84%
Vulnerable Road Users70%
Safety Assist69%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Euro NCAP - Skoda Enyaq SE L 60
Tested 2025
Adult Occupant90%
Child Occupant87%
Vulnerable Road Users77%
Safety Assist78%
Full result on euroncap.com (opens in new tab)
Warranty
Check the published battery warranty cover for each selected trim.
| Measure | Ford Puma Gen-ESelect 43kWh | Skoda EnyaqSE L 60 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery warranty | 8 years | 8 years |
| Battery warranty distance | 160,934 km (better) | 160,000 km |
Buying options
Get a quote
Ford Puma Gen-E
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Skoda Enyaq
Used on AutoTraderLease deals
Live used listings
Active inventory from independent UK dealers.
Ford Puma Gen-E
- £19,5682025Car360View
- £17,8152025Car360View
- £18,3712025Car360View
Skoda Enyaq
No active listings.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Skoda Enyaq worth the extra £9,015 over the Ford Puma Gen-E?
The Skoda Enyaq costs £9,015 more than the Ford Puma Gen-E. For that premium it adds 35 miles more WLTP range and 65 kW faster peak rapid charging. On EVcarsguide's combined category scores, the Skoda Enyaq comes out ahead overall.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years, the Ford Puma Gen-E or the Skoda Enyaq?
The Ford Puma Gen-E is £9,015 cheaper to buy. The Ford Puma Gen-E is cheaper to charge, roughly £128 a year versus £160 for the Skoda Enyaq, at 8,000 miles on an off-peak home tariff. Add 5 years of charging and the Ford Puma Gen-E comes out roughly £9,175 cheaper overall. These figures cover list price and home charging only - insurance, servicing, tyres and depreciation will move the real total.
What are the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq like on a long motorway trip?
EVcarsguide estimates a real-world motorway range of about 194 miles for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 224 miles for the Skoda Enyaq - both below their WLTP figures, because sustained high speed is the hardest case for an EV. The Skoda Enyaq goes roughly 30 miles further between charging stops. Both rapid-charge to 80% in a similar time, around 24-26 minutes.
Which is easier to park and drive in town, the Ford Puma Gen-E or the Skoda Enyaq?
The Ford Puma Gen-E is the easier car for tight UK car parks: it is 74 mm narrower than the Skoda Enyaq. In a standard 2,400 mm bay that leaves about 595 mm of total clearance for the Ford Puma Gen-E and about 521 mm of total clearance for the Skoda Enyaq. The Skoda Enyaq also turns in a 1.2 m tighter circle, which helps with U-turns and multi-storey ramps.
Which battery will hold up better as a used buy, the Ford Puma Gen-E or the Skoda Enyaq?
Over a 8-year ownership window EVcarsguide's degradation model projects roughly 84% battery health for the Ford Puma Gen-E and 84% for the Skoda Enyaq. That is close enough that capacity loss should not decide between them. Both use NMC-type cells, so for daily use keep the charge limit near 80% to slow degradation. Both batteries carry a 8-year manufacturer warranty.
Go deeper on each car
Visit the full model pages for owner feedback, expert reviews, used prices and battery-health information.
Compare against other rivals
Compare similarly sized and priced electric cars before finalising your shortlist.
More Ford Puma Gen-E comparisons
More Skoda Enyaq comparisons
See both cars in our rankings
EVcarsguide scores every verified EV on price, range, family use and running costs. Here is where this pair appears.
Where the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best family EVsWhere the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among EVs under £40,000Where the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best electric SUVsWhere the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best motorway EVsWhere the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among the best city EVsWhere the Ford Puma Gen-E and Skoda Enyaq rank among the cheapest EVs to run
Further reading
Explore buying and ownership guides to help you choose between these electric cars.
Data accuracy
Specs are sourced from manufacturer websites and manually reviewed. These figures were last verified .